Suppose you manage a small fund of $100 million fully invested in small stocks. Assume the riskfree rate is zero. Assume further that you find only 60 such stocks worthy of investing.

If the second stock has a weight of w2 = −0.02, how much money will you put into it? (in millions)

Question

Suppose you manage a small fund of $100 million fully invested in small stocks. Assume the riskfree rate is zero. Assume further that you find only 60 such stocks worthy of investing.

If the second stock has a weight of w2 = −0.02, how much money will you put into it? (in millions)

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start from the given information: the fund size is 100 million, the second stock has a weight w2 = -0.02 (negative indicating a short position), and there is no risk-free component affecting the calculation.
To determine how much money to allocate to stock 2, multiply the total capital by the stock's weight: amount = w2 × total capital = (-0.02) × 100 million = -2 million.
The negative sign signifies a short position, i.e., borrowing shares to sell now with the expectation of buying them back later at a lower price.
Now evaluate each option:
- -20 million (short): This would correspond to a weight of -0.20 (since -20 million / 100 million = -0.20). That does not match the given weight of -0.02, so this is incorrect.
- 2 million (long): This corresponds to a weight of +0.02, not -0.02, so it contradicts the specified negative weight and is incorrect.
- 20 million (long): This would be a weight of +0.20, again not matching the given -0.02 and also implying a long rather than short position, so incorrect.
- -2 million (short): This exactly matches the weight -0.02 on a 100 million fund, reflecting a short position of 2 million of capital.
Thus, the correct interpretation is a short position of 2 million in stock 2, while the other options either misstate the magnitude or the direction (long vs short) based on the provided weight.

Suppose you manage a small fund of $100 million fully invested in small stocks. Assume the riskfree rate is zero. Assume further that you find only 60 such stocks worthy of investing. If the second stock has a weight of w2 = −0.02, how much money will you put into it? (in millions)Single choice

Similar Questions

A stock has a beta of 1.56 and an expected return of 17.3 percent. A risk-free asset currently earns 5.1 percent. If a portfolio of the two assets has a beta of 1.06, what are the portfolio weights?

Part 2 of 4 The portfolio weights for each stock are: Stock A: [ Select ] -25% -50% 25% 100% 50% Stock W: [ Select ] -100% 100% -50% -25% 50% 25% Stock Z: [ Select ] -25% 50% 100% -50% -100% 25%

Part 2 of 4 The portfolio weights for each stock are: Stock A: [ Select ] Stock W: [ Select ] Stock Z: [ Select ]

Part 2 of 4 The portfolio weights for each stock are: Stock A: [ Select ] 50% -50% 25% 100% -25% Stock W: [ Select ] 50% 25% -25% 100% -100% -50% Stock Z: [ Select ] -25% -100% 50% -50% 25% 100%

Part 2 of 4: An investor allocates $20,000 into Stock A and shorts $10,000 of Stock B. What is the portfolio weight of Stock B? Round your answer to four decimals. DO NOT use percentage format. E.g. 10.51% should be entered as 0.1051

Part 2 of 4 The portfolio weights for each stock are: Stock A: [ Select ] -25% -50% 100% 25% 50% Stock W: [ Select ] -25% -100% 25% -50% 100% 50% Stock Z: [ Select ] -25% -50% 100% 50% -100% 25%

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler