When firms in a polluting industry have different costs for the technology to reduce pollution, which of the following is efficient?单项选择题

A

mandating equivalent reductions in pollution from all firms

B

mandating that each firm reduce pollution up to the point at which the marginal cost of reducing pollution is equal to the total social benefit of the reductions for each firm

C

mandating that each firm reduce pollution up to the point at which the marginal cost of reducing pollution for each firm is equal to the marginal social benefit of the reductions

D

mandating that each firm reduce pollution up to the point at which the marginal benefit of doing so is zero

登录即可查看完整答案

我们收录了全球超50000道真实原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。

类似问题

Kip and Yale run separate mining companies in the same forest. Both pollute the river flowing through the forest with debris from their work. In the table below, the first row shows the current level of debris that makes its way into the river from their work. The following table set out information that shows how much it would cost each company to reduce its pollution by additional increments of 10 pounds.    Kip Yale Current debris in pounds 60 80 Cost of reducing debris by 10 pounds $5 $2 Cost of reducing debris by a second 10 pounds $10 $4 Cost of reducing debris by a third 10 pounds $15 $6 Cost of reducing debris by a fourth 10 pounds $20 $8 Cost of reducing debris by a fifth 10 pounds $25 $10 If each mining company is forced to cut its debris in half, the respective cost to Kip and Yale will be

Consider a situation where there are two firms with different marginal abatement cost. However, the regulator does not know who is a high or low abatement cost firm (but the firms DO know their costs). The regulator wants to set a separate standard for each and use a subsidy payment to encourage truthful compliance with the correct standard on the part of the two firms involved. This situation is illustrated in the figure below. What must be true about X, Y and Z in order for the subsidy, R = $2.5M, to work?

Choose a, b, c or d as the best answer. 2. Which statement about Brutalist buildings would the author, most probably, agree with?

Section A: Read the text and answer the questions. Brutalism is an architectural style, introduced in the 1950s. It uses exposed concrete to create geometric structures with a grey appearance. Concrete buildings are often criticised as cold and ugly, lacking the warmth of stone or the smooth feel of steel. However, concrete, as a building material, has unique characteristics. It is extremely flexible when wet, and is adapted to create interesting shapes. Many urban public buildings, such as universities, have also used concrete as the main material to indicate strength and permanence. Instead of keeping Brutalist buildings, many are being demolished to make space for modern styles. However, this does not acknowledge the cultural history of these buildings, and is not sustainable. Fill in the gap with ONE WORD from the paragraph. 1. Brutalist architecture included exposed concrete, which gave a cold Answer Question 1[input] .

更多留学生实用工具

加入我们，立即解锁 海量真题 与 独家解析，让复习快人一步！