refers to the (sometimes contested) notion that science is simply a matter of
getting more and better facts, and that all genuine knowledge is either true by definition.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks us to identify which term refers to the idea that science is mainly about accumulating more and better facts, and that genuine knowledge is essentially true by definition.
Option 1: 'Neil deGrasse Tyson Syndrome' is not an established philosophical position; it’s a pop-culture reference tied to a science communicator and does not describe a recognized stance on the nature of scientific knowledge. This makes it an incorrect choice.
Option 2: 'Poststructuralism' challenges fixed meanings, universal truths, and stable structures in language and knowledge; it emphasizes how power, discourse, and context influence what counts as knowledge. It does not claim science is simply about accumulating facts or that truth is true by definition, so this option misidentifies the position.
Option 3: 'Postmodernism' broadly questions grand narratives, objective certainty, and the universality of scientific claims. While it engages with science critically, it does not promote the view that science reduces to collecting more facts or that all genuine knowledge is true by definition. Therefore this choice is inaccurate for the described notion.
Option 4: 'Positivism' is the traditional label for a view that science advances through empirical observation and the accumulation of verifiable facts, often associated with the idea that knowledge is grounded in observable phenomena and logical reasoning; some formulations even suggested a notion of truth grounded in definable, verifiable statements. This aligns with the described notion, making it the correct option.
In summary, the other options diverge from the idea in question by shifting focus to critique, context, or broader philosophical skepticism, whereas positivism centers on empirical fact gathering and verifiable knowledge as the core of science.

refers to the (sometimes contested) notion that science is simply a matter of getting more and better facts, and that all genuine knowledge is either true by definition.单项选择题

类似问题

Pluralism is a view about the relationship among sciences which holds that (Check BOTH that apply)

I this week's 1919 reading, the author argues that there are some questions for which science does not have answers. Which of the following questions ARE answerable by science, based on what the author argues in this text? There may be more than one suitable answer.

Based on video 1.2, which statement(s) reflect why we need to approach the demarcation question as a family resemblance set of indicators? Select as many as apply.

It is argued that generalised one-size-fits-all models of how science works seemed doomed to failure. What supports this argument? Select as many as apply.

Is science the correct tool to use to answer or attempt to find an answer to the question below? Write yes or no. And tell me why science IS OR IN NOT the right tool for answering the question. Do ghosts exist? Yes or no [Fill in the blank], and why [Fill in the blank], ?

This dead robin on the table has 1000 parts per million DDT in its fatty tissue.

A theory is said to be strong if it is easy to prove it is right if it is right.

True theories are stumbled upon by luck.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单