This dead robin on the table has 1000 parts per million DDT in its fatty tissue.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt presents a dead robin on the table with 1000 parts per million DDT in its fatty tissue and asks you to judge the truth of each provided answer choice.
Option 1: 'Simple scientific fact' — This phrasing suggests a plain, unambiguous fact about the situation. In real science, the presence of a contaminant like DDT in tissue can be described as data-supported but often requires context (units, measurement method, sampling, and interpretation). Labeling it as a pure 'fact' ignores the nuance that scientific conclusions depend on definitions and frameworks, so this option seems oversimplified.
Option 2: 'Theory-assisted scientific fact' — This acknowledges that what we observe (DDT concentration in tissue) is an empirical observation, but its interpretation is guided by theories about toxicology, bioaccumulation, and ecological impact. In scientific practice, measurements are interpreted within theoretical models to determine significance, risk, and causality, making this option a more accurate characterization.
Option 3: 'Outside science' — Denying a connection between the observed measurement and scientific theory would be incorrect, since contaminant analyses and their implications fall squarely within scientific methodologies and established knowledge in environmental science and toxicology.
Option 4: 'Theory' — While the statement involves theory in interpretation, labeling the entire observation strictly as a 'theory' disregards that there is concrete measurement data (the 1000 ppm in tissue) that can be reported as observed, with theory providing the framework to interpret its meaning. This option misrepresents the nature of the claim by not acknowledging the empirical component.
In summary, Option 2 aligns with how scientific knowledge is typically framed: empirical data described within a theoretical context to interpret and communicate meaning. The other options either oversimplify the empirical nature, wrongly classify it as outside science, or miscast the relationship between data and theory.

This dead robin on the table has 1000 parts per million DDT in its fatty tissue.单项选择题

类似问题

Pluralism is a view about the relationship among sciences which holds that (Check BOTH that apply)

I this week's 1919 reading, the author argues that there are some questions for which science does not have answers. Which of the following questions ARE answerable by science, based on what the author argues in this text? There may be more than one suitable answer.

Based on video 1.2, which statement(s) reflect why we need to approach the demarcation question as a family resemblance set of indicators? Select as many as apply.

It is argued that generalised one-size-fits-all models of how science works seemed doomed to failure. What supports this argument? Select as many as apply.

refers to the (sometimes contested) notion that science is simply a matter of getting more and better facts, and that all genuine knowledge is either true by definition.

Is science the correct tool to use to answer or attempt to find an answer to the question below? Write yes or no. And tell me why science IS OR IN NOT the right tool for answering the question. Do ghosts exist? Yes or no [Fill in the blank], and why [Fill in the blank], ?

A theory is said to be strong if it is easy to prove it is right if it is right.

True theories are stumbled upon by luck.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单