ORIGINAL TEXT

From page 12 of a book by Michael Halliday published in 1985

For about 99.5 per cent of the history of the human race, the only medium of expression for language has been sound, produced by organs of speech ... in modifying the stream of air that comes from the diaphragm

STUDENT’S ASSIGNMENT

For almost all of human history, the only linguistic form of communication has been speech (Halliday, 1985).

Is the student’s summary acceptable?

Question

ORIGINAL TEXT

From page 12 of a book by Michael Halliday published in 1985

For about 99.5 per cent of the history of the human race, the only medium of expression for language has been sound, produced by organs of speech ... in modifying the stream of air that comes from the diaphragm

STUDENT’S ASSIGNMENT

For almost all of human history, the only linguistic form of communication has been speech (Halliday, 1985).

Is the student’s summary acceptable?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Reiterating the question and choices helps frame the analysis: the original text states that for about 99.5% of human history, the medium of expression for language has been sound produced by organs of speech, related to modifying the stream of air from the diaphragm. The student’s assignment summary says: 'For almost all of human history, the only linguistic form of communication has been speech (Halliday, 1985).' Options: [Yes, No].
Option 1 (Yes): This option asserts that the summary is acceptable. A careful reading shows a mismatch: the source text distinguishes between the 'medium of expression' (sound) and the 'linguistic form' (speech). The claim that the only linguistic form of communication has been speech is more restrictive, omitting other potential forms such as signed languages or gestural communication that have linguistic value in humans, even if historically rare. Moreover, equating 'medium' with 'form' conflates how language is produced with what counts as a linguistic form, which can lead to an incomplete or misleading summary of Halliday’s point. In short, the summary captures the historical prevalence of sound/ speech but incorrectly labels it as the sole linguistic form and uses a broader implication that there were no other linguistic modalities.
Option 2 (No): This option states that the summary is not acceptable. From a critical standpoint, pointing out the key precise distinction in the original—sound as the medium and speech as a form—supports the idea that the summary is oversimplified or partially inaccurate. The term 'linguistic form' focuses on what counts as language content (spoken language) rather than the physical channel (sound), whereas Halliday’s wording emphasizes the channel (sound) and its physiological production, which could be interpreted as broader than just the spoken word. The summary’s omission of the distinction between medium and form is a substantive reduction of the nuance in the original, making the No stance plausible because it flags an inadequacy in the summarization. However, one could also argue that if the assignment is intended to be a gist, some students might reasonably paraphrase by emphasizing that speech dominated language use historically; the risk is losing the explicit nuance about medium versus form and about potential non-speech linguistic modalities.
Take note of the potential confusion: if the assignment aims for a concise gist, a student might reasonably phrase it as 'speech dominated language historically,' yet the precise claim in the source stresses the medium (sound) rather than asserting that speech was the only linguistic form. The key discriminatory point is whether the summary preserves the critical distinction between medium and form and whether it recognizes or omits other possible linguistic modalities implied by the original phrasing.
In summary, the Yes option is flawed because it incorrectly equates medium with form and omits non-speech linguistic modalities, while the No option correctly flags this insufficiency, though it should be careful to articulate the nuance precisely. The essential critique centers on summary accuracy regarding what is being claimed about 'medium' versus 'form' and the potential presence of other linguistic modalities in the historical record.

Similar Questions

When I paraphrase, I must

Which paraphrase below best captures the author’s original evaluation and strength? Original: “Perhaps the most important attribute for introductory sociology students to acquire is sociological curiosity.”

Which is NOT a recommended paraphrasing strategy? Choose the item below that is NOT a strategy used to paraphrase information from source material.

What is NOT required for a successful paraphrase? Choose the item below that is NOT needed when paraphrasing an idea from source material.

Which statement about choosing class words is most accurate?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler