Michael Hiscox explains trade coalitions across 200 years in six Western nations by considering whether the factors of production are mobile from one industry to another. His theory also assumes that the factors of production--capital, labor and land--are not geographically mobile, even though Hiscox does not consider the high level of outflows of emigrants from Europe and inflows of immigrants and slaves to the white settlement countries. Today we live in a highly globalized world. There is extensive trade in goods and services from around the world at great speed and over great distances. Capital, both finance and fixed foreign direct investment, is more mobile, at higher volumes, and at higher rates, than ever before. Labor is also as mobile, but maybe not as much as it was in the 19th century, and governments in developed countries are actively trying to restrict it. Land is immobile. Do you think his theory still applies to developed and developing countries today? Answer in 200-250 words. No need to cite academic sources.   论述题

登录即可查看完整答案

我们收录了全球超50000道真实原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。

类似问题

更多留学生实用工具

加入我们,立即解锁 海量真题独家解析,让复习快人一步!