Which of the following business tactics are ways that firms in an oligopolistic industry attempt to legally collude?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Price leadership — where a dominant firm announces or sets a price and rivals follow — is a common legal mechanism by which firms in an oligopoly can tacitly coordinate behavior without an explicit agreement.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Oligopoly: few firms dominate a market, so each firm’s actions affect others.
- Collusion: firms coordinating to restrict competition; explicit collusion (price-fixing agreements) is illegal under antitrust law, while tacit collusion (no explicit agreement) can occur and is harder to prosecute.
- Price leadership: a form of tacit coordination where a dominant firm (or an agreed leader) announces prices and others match them, effectively signaling intended pricing.
- Other strategies in oligopoly (product differentiation, nonprice competition, advertising, price wars) are competitive tactics, not collusive arrangements.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
Step 1: Identify legal vs illegal coordination. Explicit meetings or agreements to set prices are illegal. Tacit mechanisms that convey information can facilitate coordination without an explicit pact.
Step 2: Evaluate each option for whether it achieves coordination/signaling without an explicit agreement. Price leadership directly communicates a price path that rivals can follow, creating coordinated outcomes akin to collusion but without an explicit agreement.
Step 3: Conclude which option fits the definition of legal collusion (tacit coordination). Price leadership fits; the others do not.

3. Calculations
No numerical calculations are required for this conceptual question.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
Using price leadership for signaling lets firms align prices indirectly: the leader sets or announces a price and other firms, to avoid losing market share or initiating a destructive price war, adopt the same price. This creates coordinated pricing outcomes without a formal agreement, making it a typical legal (tacit) collusive tactic in oligopolies.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- Differentiating their products: competitive strategy to gain market power via nonprice attributes, not a collusive signal.
- Engaging in nonprice competition: efforts (service, quality, branding) to compete without price cuts; not a collusive coordination device.
- Advertising: a competitive tool to influence demand and market share, not a way to signal coordinated pricing.
- Lowering prices in a trade war: active competitive undercutting, the opposite of collusion; may be predatory but is not a collusive tactic.

6. Conclusion
Therefore, the correct choice is using price leadership for signaling, which matches the provided answer.

Which of the following business tactics are ways that firms in an oligopolistic industry attempt to legally collude?单项选择题

类似问题

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

Why have most international agreements for environmental protection been based on the honor system?

As was exhibited with the Montreal Protocol and the encouragement of reduced CFC production, trade can be an effective tool to compel compliance with international treaties.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单