In a cross-sectional study of the association between alcohol consumption and dementia, the most appropriate effect measure to calculate is:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In a cross-sectional study, the data capture exposure and outcome at a single point in time, which means we are typically assessing prevalence rather than incidence. 
Option 1: odds ratio. This is commonly used in cross-sectional analyses because logistic regression—frequently applied to cross-sectional data—produces an odds ratio as the measure of association. It is a valid and widely used effect size for the association between alcohol consumption (exposure) and dementia (outcome) in this study design. 
Option 2: relative risk. Relative risk (risk ratio) is most directly interpretable for cohort studies where incidence over time can be observed. In a cross-sectional study, we do not have incidence, making RR not directly estimable without strong assumptions or special methods, so it is not the most appropriate default measure here. 
Option 3: population attributable risk. PAF quantifies the proportion of cases in the population attributable to the exposure and typically relies on incidence or risk data over time; it is not a direct measure of association between exposure and disease in a cross-sectional snapshot, and would require additional data and assumptions beyond what a basic cross-sectional analysis provides. 
Option 4: risk difference. The risk difference reflects absolute difference in risk/prevalence between exposure groups, which again presupposes a clear estimate of risk or incidence in a temporal sense; in a cross-sectional context, especially when outcomes are relatively common, it is less straightforward to estimate and interpret compared to an odds ratio within standard cross-sectional analyses. 
Overall, given the cross-sectional design and common analytic approaches, the odds ratio is the most appropriate and routinely used effect measure among the options provided, while the other measures face limitations or require data not readily available from a cross-sectional snapshot.

In a cross-sectional study of the association between alcohol consumption and dementia, the most appropriate effect measure to calculate is:单项选择题

类似问题

In the colonies of Victoria and New South Wales, when was Gold discovered?[Fill in the blank]

The Torres Strait Islanders belong to the islands north of which state?[Fill in the blank]

In Australia, voting is compulsory in what elections?[Fill in the blank]

Drop the characteristics of the Overlords Dragon onto its bits:[Fill in the blank]

Please match the following to the letters label on the image[Fill in the blank]

What proportion of telephone calls lasted 5 minutes or more?[Fill in the blank]

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单