The number of bicycles sold over the first four months of the year at a particular shop is given in the table below.[table]
Month | January | February | March | April Bicycles sold | 83 | 75 | 63 | 70
[/table]The centered two-point moving mean number of sales for February is

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks for the centered two-point moving mean number of sales for February, given the monthly bicycle sales: January 83, February 75, March 63, April 70.
First, I will clarify what a centered two-point moving mean typically means. A two-point moving average uses two consecutive data points, and 'centered' usually implies the average is associated with the point midway between those two data points. For February, the natural centered two-point average would involve the data points surrounding February, which are January and March, giving (83 + 63) / 2 = 146 / 2 = 73.0.
However, if we instead interpret a two-point moving average that is centered at February using the two points immediately preceding and including February (i.e., January and February), we get (83 + 75) / 2 = 158 / 2 = 79.0. This would place the average at the position between January and February, not precisely centered on February.
Now, let’s consider other interpretations to see how they compare:
- Using January and March (the values around February) yields (83 + 63) / 2 = 73.0. This aligns with the conventional centered (around February) two-point approach, but not with the 79.0 result.
- Using February and March would give (75 + 63) / 2 = 138 / 2 = 69.0. This is another two-point average, but it centers between February and March, not February itself.
- Using January and February yields 79.0, which matches the provided numerical value but corresponds to a two-point average centered between January and February, not centered on February according to the standard interpretation.
Given the wording, the mathematically traditional centered two-point average for February would be 73.0, using January and March. The value 79.0 corresponds to averaging January and February, which is a two-point average but not centered on February in the typical sense.
In summary, the calculation (83 + 63) / 2 = 73.0 is the conventional centered two-point moving mean for February, whereas (83 + 75) / 2 = 79.0 yields a two-point average that is centered between January and February, not February itself. The other variant (75 + 63) / 2 = 69.0 centers between February and March.
Therefore, if you are strictly applying the standard definition of a centered two-point moving mean for February, the result would be 73.0, not 79.0. The 79.0 value corresponds to a two-point average of January and February, which is a different framing of the moving mean.

The number of bicycles sold over the first four months of the year at a particular shop is given in the table below.[table] Month | January | February | March | April Bicycles sold | 83 | 75 | 63 | 70 [/table]The centered two-point moving mean number of sales for February is数值题

类似问题

The two-moving mean for time period 5 with centring is closest to:

The three-moving mean for time period 2 is closest to:

The four-moving mean for time period 4 with centring is closest to:

The three-moving mean for time period 2 is closest to:

What is one advantage of using a moving average for forecasting?

When evaluating a new project, firms should include in the projected cash flows all of the following EXCEPT:

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单