What is NOT a recommended practice for handling missing data during EDA?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In exploring the handling of missing data during EDA, it helps to evaluate each option on its own merits and limitations.
Option a: 'Removing affected rows if the percentage of missing data is low' — This can be a reasonable, pragmatic approach when missingness is minimal and unlikely to bias results. It preserves the integrity of analyses by excluding only a small subset. However, one must ensure that the removal doesn't disproportionately affect important groups or introduce bias, which means this method should be used judiciously rather than as an automatic rule.
Option b: 'Imputing using the mean or median' — Imputing with mean or median is a classic, simple imputation technique. It can reduce bias from missingness and keep dataset size intact, especially for numeric features. Yet, it ignores the potential relationships between features and the uncertainty about the true value, which can lead to underestimation of variance and distorted analyses if the data are not missing completely at random.
Option c: 'Leaving missing data unaddressed' — This stance is generally not recommended in EDA. Leaving gaps in the data can propagate uncertainty, hinder many analyses, and obscure patterns. Most analyses assume complete data matrices or, at minimum, acknowledged handling of missingness, so ignoring missing values is typically considered a poor practice.
Option d: 'Replacing with a constant value' — Imputing a constant (e.g., -1 or 'missing') is occasionally used, especially for categorical features or in certain modeling contexts, to explicitly mark missingness. However, it can severely distort distributions and relationships if not handled carefully, and it may mislead analyses that treat the substituted values as true observations.
Across these choices, the standout poor practice is leaving missing data unaddressed, since it yields incomplete information and undermines most downstream analyses. The other options offer viable strategies under appropriate conditions, with caveats about bias, variance, and the nature of the missingness.

What is NOT a recommended practice for handling missing data during EDA?Single choice

Similar Questions

Which step is essential in handling missing data?

Creating a dummy variable to indicate a missing predictor value is a valid way to handle missing values

In our course, if I don't have any information about a specific Marin Factor I should assign a value of:

When evaluating a new project, firms should include in the projected cash flows all of the following EXCEPT:

Provide the best rationale for what's wrong with supply chains today?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler