According to Hofstadter, what is missing in machine translation like Google Translate?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restated: According to Hofstadter, what is missing in machine translation like Google Translate?

Option 1: Nuance, subtlety, and cultural context
- This option points to features Hofstadter emphasizes as challenging for machines: the subtle shades of meaning, implied cultural knowledge, and the nuances that humans infer from context. The argument is that translation isn’t just word-for-word replacement; it requires grasping intent, idioms, humor, and social connotations, which are areas where current MT often falter.

Option 2: Speed and efficiency
- Speed and efficiency concern how fast a translation is produced and how computationally inexpensive the process is. While these are practical considerations, Hofstadter’s critique isn’t that MT is too slow or inefficient; it’s that it misses deeper interpretive elements, so speed isn’t the core missing piece here.

Option 3: Accuracy and precision
- Accuracy and precision relate to how closely a translation matches a source text. Although MT can struggle with accuracy, especially for ambiguous phrases or idioms, the term

According to Hofstadter, what is missing in machine translation like Google Translate?单项选择题

类似问题

Which of the following languages did Hofstadter NOT use as an example for analyzing Google Translate?

How does Google Translate approach translation?

According to the reading, what is a major limitation of Google Translate?

What is the main focus of "The Shallowness of Google Translate" by Douglas Hofstadter?

In which security measure will you find anti-virus software?

What are user permissions?

Which security measure will stop someone reading your messages if they find your smart phone?

On a network a firewall

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单