Consider the following estimated regression model [math: ln⁡(yi)^=0.034−0.023xi]\widehat {\ln (y_i)}=0.034-0.023x_i where [math: ln⁡(.)]\ln (.) denotes the natural log. Which of the following is a correct interpretation?[Fill in the blank]

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let’s parse the given regression model carefully and translate it into an interpretable statement. The model is ln(y_i) = 0.034 − 0.023 x_i, where ln(.) is the natural log. This is a log-linear model, meaning the dependent variable is in logs while the independent variable x is in levels.

Option a: A 1 unit decrease in x is associated with a 2.3 percent increase in the expected value of y. This matches the standard interpretation: the coefficient −0.023 on x implies that for a one-unit increase in x, ln(y) decreases by 0.023, which approximates a 2.3% decrease in y when you exponentiate back to the level of y. Conversely, a one-unit decrease in x would increase y by about 2.3%. Since the exact percent change is approximately 100*(exp(-0.023) − 1) ≈ −2.27% for an increase, the corresponding decrease yields about +2.27%. So the direction and magnitude are consistent with the log-linear interpretation.

Option b: A 1 percent decrease in x is associated with a 0.023 unit increase in the expected value of y. This misinterprets both the unit of x (it is not measured in percent here) and the scale of y (the model uses ln(y), not y directly, and the coefficient does not translate to a 0.023 unit increase in y). Therefore this is incorrect.

Option c: A 1 percent increase in x is associated with a 2.3 unit increase in the expected value of y. Again, the percent change in x is not the same as the unit change used to estimate ln(y). Also, the 2.3 unit increase in y is not the proper interpretation since the model does not directly estimate y in level units, but ln(y). This statement confuses the logarithmic transformation with equal-magnitude level changes.

Option d: A 1 unit increase in x is associated with a 0.00023 percent decrease in the expected value of y. The magnitude here is far too small and the direction is opposite of what the coefficient would imply for a unit increase in x. The correct expansion would yield a roughly 2.3% change (in the opposite direction), not a 0.00023% change, so this is incorrect.

Consider the following estimated regression model [math: ln⁡(yi)^=0.034−0.023xi]\widehat {\ln (y_i)}=0.034-0.023x_i where [math: ln⁡(.)]\ln (.) denotes the natural log. Which of the following is a correct interpretation?[Fill in the blank]Single choice

Similar Questions

The following data were collected for two related variables x and y. A scatterplot indicates a non-linear association. The data is linearised using a logx transformation and a least squares line is then fitted. The equation of this line isclosest to:

An exponential model with a quarterly data forecasting equation is log( ˆ Y i)=2.0886+0.0016Xi−0.0528Q1−0.0389Q2−0.0449Q3 Where Xi represents the coded quarter, Qi is a dummy variable for quarters, Qi=1 if it is ith quarter. What is the prediction when Xi=27, and it is the fourth quarter?

The following data were collected for two related variables x and y. A scatterplot indicates a non-linear association. The data is linearised using a logx transformation and a least squares line is then fitted. The equation of this line isclosest to:

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

Why have most international agreements for environmental protection been based on the honor system?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler