Which of the following statements offers an explanation that supports the theory of Living Constitutionalism?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks which statement provides an explanation that supports the theory of Living Constitutionalism, so we need to evaluate how well each option aligns with that theory.
Option 1: 'The Constitution has no definitive meaning and so judges can use the ambiguity to enact their own policy preferences.' This view suggests judicial activism driven by personal policy goals rather than a theory about constitutional interpretation that accounts for evolving meaning; it overemphasizes ambiguity and can lead to arbitrary outcomes, which is not the standard articulation of Living Constitutionalism.
Option 2: 'The Constitution evolves and grows over time as its broad values are applied to new situations in a changing society.' This directly captures the core idea of Living Constitutionalism: the text embodies enduring principles, but their application adapts as society changes, allowing constitutional meaning to develop with time and context. This framing is the hallmark of the Living approach.
Option 3: 'The Constitution is an attempt to live up to the values of the Declaration of Independence, which represents the living spirit of the American people.' While this connects constitutional values to the Declaration, Living Constitutionalism focuses on the evolving interpretation of the Constitution itself rather than aligning it primarily with the Declaration’s framers’ intentions or a continual reference to a living spirit; the linkage is more about source values than about adaptive interpretation of constitutional text.
Option 4: 'The Constitution reflects the will of the people at the time when it was originally adopted and on those momentous occasions when it was subsequently amended.' This description aligns more with originalism or a more static interpretive approach, emphasizing original meanings or changes through amendments, rather than a dynamic, evolving interpretation characteristic of Living Constitutionalism.
In summary, option 2 most accurately and directly articulates the Living Constitutionalism view by emphasizing evolving interpretation as society changes, while the other options either hinge on static readings, claim excessive ambiguity without a mechanism for evolution, or anchor interpretation to sources or historical moments in a way that contrasts with the central Living Constitutionalism idea across time.

Which of the following statements offers an explanation that supports the theory of Living Constitutionalism?单项选择题

类似问题

How does Davis Strauss explain the way that the US has a living constitution?

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

Why have most international agreements for environmental protection been based on the honor system?

As was exhibited with the Montreal Protocol and the encouragement of reduced CFC production, trade can be an effective tool to compel compliance with international treaties.

The Stockholm Declaration and UNEP were the result of the Blank ______ first conference on the Human Environment in 1972.

In addition to the direct mission of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), why was CITES so important?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单