Coates believes that the dreamers who plundered the black body will now go on to plunder something else. What?

Question

Coates believes that the dreamers who plundered the black body will now go on to plunder something else.  What?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Coates’ critique links a logic of extraction and devaluation—used historically against Black bodies—to a broader pattern that will target natural systems next; thus he predicts they will plunder the environment.

Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- “Plunder” here means systematic exploitation and disposability of a group or resource for profit and power.
- “Dreamers” refers to those invested in an American ideal who have profited from racialized exploitation (slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, mass incarceration).
- Coates often connects racial capitalism’s extractive logic to other forms of extraction (land, resources, environment).

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Identify who were plundered: Coates documents how Black bodies have been treated as resources to be exploited economically and socially.
2. Identify the actors: the “dreamers” are the beneficiaries and perpetuators of that exploitative system.
3. Identify the pattern: exploitation is not confined to people; it is a mode of relation—treating something as expendable to extract value.
4. Project forward: once a social group is deemed expendable, the same extractive mindset can be redirected toward nonhuman systems—soil, water, air, ecosystems.
5. Conclude that Coates warns these actors will next apply their extractive practices to the environment, degrading and exploiting natural resources without regard for ecological or human consequences.

Why the environment is correct:
The environment fits Coates’ argument because it is treated as a resource to be stripped for profit in the same moral economy that allowed the plunder of Black bodies. This is not about targeting another human group but about the extension of extractive logic to nature.

Why other plausible options are incorrect:
- If choices included groups like “immigrants” or “the poor,” those are human targets; Coates’ claim here shifts the object of plunder from human bodies to natural systems.
- “Their own children” or similar options don’t capture the extractive, resource-oriented sense of “plunder” Coates uses.

Final confirmation: The correct answer is the environment.

Coates believes that the dreamers who plundered the black body will now go on to plunder something else. What?Single choice

Similar Questions

Question at position 25 What does The Story of an Hour suggest about the institution of marriage in the late 19th century? 4ELIM27It is confining and oppressive.It is irrelevant.It is a symbol of social status. It is a source of liberation.It provides ultimate happiness.

Question at position 2 What is the significance of the title "Sweat"? 4ELI7.7It symbolizes hard work and sufferingIt symbolizes wealthIt symbolizes joyIt symbolizes freedom

Question at position 1 What is the main conflict in "Sweat" by Zora Neale Hurston? 4ELI7.1Man vs. societyMan vs. technologyMan vs. manMan vs. nature

Question at position 1 How does Victor Frankenstein react to his creation? 4ELI6.3With prideWith indifferenceWith horrorWith joy

The theme of this poem can best be interpreted as:

In Smoke Signals, what does the journey Victor and Thomas take primarily represent?

James Baldwin argues that the duty of black people is to love their "lost, younger brothers." Does Coates commission his son to struggle for the dreamers in the same way? Yes or no?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler