Each year 4% of people living in Tauranga move to Christchurch, and 4% of people in Christchurch move to Tauranga. If the populations of Christchurch and Tauranga are currently 381,877 and 131,887 people, respectively, what was the population of Christchurch last year (to the nearest individual)?

You must use matrices to solve this question, as other methods may lead to premature rounding.

Question

Each year 4% of people living in Tauranga move to Christchurch, and 4% of people in Christchurch move to Tauranga. If the populations of Christchurch and Tauranga are currently 381,877 and 131,887 people, respectively, what was the population of Christchurch last year (to the nearest individual)?

You must use matrices to solve this question, as other methods may lead to premature rounding.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Model the populations by the state vector x_t = [C_t; T_t] and the yearly transfer as a linear map x_{t+1} = A x_t with
A = [[0.96, 0.04],
     [0.04, 0.96]].
(Each year Christchurch keeps 96% of its people and receives 4% of Tauranga, and vice versa.)

1) Relevant knowledge points
- Discrete linear dynamical systems: x_{t+1} = A x_t.
- To find last year’s population x_{t-1} given x_t, compute x_{t-1} = A^{-1} x_t.
- Inverse of a 2×2 matrix [[a,b],[b,a]] is 1/(a^2-b^2) * [[a,-b],[-b,a]]; working with exact fractions avoids premature rounding.

2) Step-by-step reasoning and 3) intermediate calculations
Given current populations x_t = [381,877; 131,887], set a = 0.96 = 24/25 and b = 0.04 = 1/25.
det(A) = a^2 − b^2 = (24/25)^2 − (1/25)^2 = (576−1)/625 = 575/625 = 23/25.

A^{-1} = 1/det(A) * [[a, −b], [−b, a]]
       = (25/23) * [[24/25, −1/25], [−1/25, 24/25]]
       = [[24/23, −1/23], [−1/23, 24/23]].

Last year’s Christchurch population (first component of x_{t-1}) is
(24/23)*381,877 − (1/23)*131,887
= (24·381,877 − 131,887)/23
= (9,165,048 − 131,887)/23
= 9,033,161 / 23
= 392,746 + 3/23
≈ 392,746.13043478.

Rounding to the nearest individual gives 392,746.

4) Why this is correct
Using the inverse of the exact transition matrix yields the exact rational expression 9,033,161/23, avoiding intermediate decimal rounding. That produces the precise prior-year population; any approximate inversion or premature rounding could shift the final integer by one.

5) Other options (if any)
No multiple-choice options were provided. A direct algebraic approach (solving two linear equations) is equivalent but must keep exact arithmetic; numeric rounding before inversion can produce small errors.

6) Conclusion
The population of Christchurch last year was 392,746, matching the provided answer.

Similar Questions

If 𝑀 = [ 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 3 1 ] , then which of the following is 𝑀 − 1 ?

If [ 3 − 4 − 4 − 5 ] 𝑋 + [ − 1 2 − 5 − 1 ] = [ 4 1 − 1 3 ] 𝑋 , which of the following matrices is 𝑋 ?

Let 𝐴 = [ 0 0 0 3 5 − 1 − 1 2 3 ] , and 𝐵 = [ 1 − 4 2 3 − 3 3 0 1 − 1 ] . Which of the following options is − 2 𝐴 𝐵 𝑇 ?

True or False: Given an array of features x and an array of corresponding coefficients c, you can compute a predicted value by doing x @ c

Complete this scalar multiplication: The solution will be:

Suppose you are given a random vector ( n x 1 matrix ) where n=9. How many rows are in V(X)? c002.p0180.q003

Suppose 𝐴 is an 𝑛 × 𝑛 invertible matrix. Which of the following statements is FALSE?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler