Which of the following is not a common cause of language change?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Social interaction, communicative efficiency, innovation, and cumulative random variation are the primary engines of language change; top-down government regulation or strict prescriptive policy is not typically a driving cause.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Language change occurs through internal mechanisms (analogy, regularization, phonetic erosion), social mechanisms (contact, identity, prestige), cognitive/communicative pressures (simplification, ease of articulation, ambiguity resolution), and external innovation (new technology producing new vocabulary).
- Prescriptive policy (government regulation, language academies) attempts to control or standardize language but usually resists or lags behind natural change. Language planning can influence usage but is not a common origin of change.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Identify the four answer choices and classify them as either commonly observed causes or not.
- Compare each choice against empirical evidence and mechanisms of change.
- Determine which item does not fit the typical causal list.

3. Intermediate steps / evidence
- Simplification for efficient communication: well-documented (e.g., reduction of consonant clusters, grammaticalization) — common cause.
- Random small individual variations accumulating: fundamental to change (variation + selection) — common cause.
- New inventions introducing new words: neologisms and lexical borrowing are primary sources of vocabulary change — common cause.
- Government regulations or strict policy: prescriptive efforts (e.g., language academies) may standardize or attempt to prevent change but seldom originate widespread structural changes; examples (French Academy, prescriptive grammar rules) show limited ability to halt natural drift.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
Government regulation is reactive and prescriptive; it typically seeks to fix usage rather than produce the spontaneous, bottom-up innovations that drive change. While policy can affect standard forms, it is not a common causal mechanism for natural, widespread language change.

5. Why the other options are incorrect
- Simplification: a well-known driver (phonetic reduction, grammaticalization).
- Random variations accumulating: core evolutionary model of language change (variation + selection).
- New inventions: introduce lexicon and semantic shifts frequently.

6. Conclusion
Therefore, the option "Government regulations or strict policy on language use." is not a common cause of language change. This confirms the provided correct answer.

Which of the following is not a common cause of language change?单项选择题

类似问题

Your friend Amita thinks that languages stay pretty stable across generations. Your other friend Chae-Won thinks that all living languages naturally change, at least to some extent, across generations. Who is right?

Which of the following trees corresponds to a potential parse of the ambiguous sentence below, with correct syntactic categories? Some diagnostics are provided.

Which of the following sentences contain two non-finite verbs? Select all that apply.

Analyze the following sentence: The sentence contains [ Select ] 8 6 5 7 3 4 functional words, [ Select ] 2 3 1 4 5 count nouns, [ Select ] 4 5 2 1 3 mass nouns, and [ Select ] 1 5 2 3 4 adjectives.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单