The results from the study on British Sign Language by Comier et al. in deaf children shows that:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents a question about the findings of a study on British Sign Language by Comier et al. in deaf children, asking us to choose which statement the results support.
Option A: 'Grammar performance is worse than that of hearing children.' This claim makes a broad comparison about grammar performance between deaf children and hearing children. Unless the study specifically reports a clear deficit in grammar relative to hearing peers, this statement would be an overgeneralization. Without that explicit result, labeling grammar as worse is not reliably supported.
Option B: 'Transfer between two distinct language systems can facilitate acquisition.' This option points to cross-linguistic or cross-system transfer, a concept supported in bilingual and bimodal language research, where knowledge from one language system (e.g., a sign language) can scaffold learning in another (e.g., a spoken or written language), or where two distinct systems interact to support overall language development. If Comier et al. reported benefits from such transfer in deaf children, this would be a plausible and evidence-based interpretation.
Option C: 'The limited role of CDS in late learners.' CDS refers to child-directed speech. While some studies discuss the role of CDS in language development, this option makes a specific claim about limited CDS impact on late learners, which would require direct evidence from the study about CDS. If the study emphasized cross-system transfer rather than focusing on CDS limitations, this option would be less likely to reflect its main finding.
Option D: 'There is evidence for a critical period that aligns with that of second-language learners.' A claim about a shared or aligned critical period would suggest a timing constraint for language acquisition. Unless the study explicitly demonstrated a critical period effect comparable to second-language learning, this statement would be speculative and not necessarily a reported result of that particular research.
In summary, Option B highlights cross-system transfer as a facilitator of acquisition, which aligns with a common interpretation in bimodal bilingual research and matches the provided correct answer. The other options either overstate deficits, misattribute findings to CDS without direct support, or assert a critical-period claim that the study may not have established.

The results from the study on British Sign Language by Comier et al. in deaf children shows that:Single choice

Similar Questions

What statement best describes the poverty of the stimulus argument against Skinner’s view that language is acquired by operant conditioning?

What statement best describes the poverty of the stimulus argument against Skinner’s view that language is acquired by operant conditioning?

The first words that infants raised in English-speaking settings use are generally

According to your textbook, Nelson believed that the acquisition of scripts is integral to the acquisition of:

An innate language-processing capacity to acquire grammar is called:

According to the text, evidence that babies are born with a preference for speech over other sounds and within a few days are able to distinguish the basic sounds of languages suggests:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler