In *Nature*, Emerson repeatedly contrasts childhood wonder with adult practicality. What rhetorical device is he using by placing these two concepts in opposition?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In this question, we’re asked to identify the rhetorical device Emerson uses when he pits childhood wonder against adult practicality in Nature.
Option 1: Juxtaposition. This is the pairing of two contrasting ideas in close proximity to highlight their differences, such as placing innocence or wonder next to practicality or rationality to show tension between them. This description fits the technique being described.
Option 2: Syllogism. A syllogism consists of two premises that lead to a conclusion (for example, All humans are mortal; Socrates is human; therefore Socrates is mortal). The example in the prompt does not present premises and a deduced conclusion in this way, so this option misidentifies the device.
Option 3: Anadiplosis. Anadiplosis happens when the ending word or phrase of one clause repeats at the beginning of the next clause (e.g., fear leads to fear). There is no such repetition pattern evident in the contrast between childhood wonder and adult practicality here, so this is unlikely.
Option 4: Rhetorical question. A rhetorical question is asked for effect rather than to solicit an answer. The scenario described relies on contrasting ideas rather than asking a question to provoke thought, so this option doesn’t fit.
In summary, the described technique centers on placing two opposing concepts side by side to emphasize their difference, rather than employing premise-based deduction, repetitive linking, or a question-for-effect format.

In Nature, Emerson repeatedly contrasts childhood wonder with adult practicality. What rhetorical device is he using by placing these two concepts in opposition?单项选择题

类似问题

Which of the following juxtapositions have we discussed as a motif so far:

The arrangement of two opposing ideas, characters, or objects side-by-side or in similar narratives is known as?

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

Name the political scientist who argues that parties are designed to serve the needs of ambitious politicians (namely candidates and officeholders).

Name the political scientist who said this famous quote about the problems of pluralism: “The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly choir sings with a strong upper-class accent.”

What is the name of the third party candidate in 2000 who was not allowed to participate in the presidential debates? Hint: We watched a video clip with him in class.

E.E. Schattshneider said, "Democracy is ________ save in terms of the parties."

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单

In *Nature*, Emerson repeatedly contrasts childhood wonder with adult practicality. What rhetorical device is he using by placing these two concepts in opposition?单项选择题