Japan’s “Continental Policy” is best understood as:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Japan’s Continental Policy represents a strategic orientation toward expansion on the Asian mainland, not isolation or a single coup-like event.

Relevant knowledge points:
- In late 19th and early 20th centuries Japan debated foreign strategy: continental (mainland) versus maritime/southern expansion. Continentalism favored influence and control over Korea, Manchuria, and China.
- Key historical manifestations: the First Sino-Japanese War (1894–95), Russo-Japanese War (1904–05), annexation of Korea (1910), the Manchurian Incident and establishment of Manchukuo (1931), and the broader invasion of China (1937 onward).
- Motivations included securing resources, strategic depth against continental powers (notably Russia and China), and nationalist/military pressures within Japan.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Define “Continental Policy” conceptually: a policy favoring engagement with, influence over, and territorial expansion into the Asian continent.
2. Compare to historical actions: Japan’s repeated military and political moves on the mainland (Korea, Manchuria, China) show an accumulating pattern rather than a single, isolated event.
3. Assess answer choices: “defensive isolationist doctrine” contradicts outward, interventionist behavior; “military rebellion” implies an internal overthrow, which does not describe a sustained foreign policy orientation; “official master plan” implies a single, formalized blueprint—historically the policy evolved through successive decisions and campaigns, not a single codified document.
4. Conclude that the term best fits a cumulative strategic orientation toward mainland expansion.

Why the correct answer is correct:
Continental Policy describes the gradual, strategic pursuit of influence and territory on Asia’s mainland, implemented through multiple wars, occupations, and annexations—hence “cumulative strategic orientation.”

Why other options are incorrect:
- Defensive isolationist doctrine: opposite of expansionist behavior.
- Military rebellion: mischaracterizes policy as internal revolt.
- Official master plan: overstates the formalization; policy was evolving and driven by military and political actors over decades.

Final confirmation: The correct choice is “A cumulative strategic orientation toward mainland expansion.”

Japan’s “Continental Policy” is best understood as:单项选择题

类似问题

Despite apologetic narratives dominating Japanese culture and politics, Japanese foreign policy after the San Francisco Treaty of 1951 drew which conclusion from the defeat in WWII.

You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,021.61. The bond matures in 11 years. What is the yield to maturity?

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

It will cost $9,600 to acquire an ice cream cart that is expected to produce cash inflows of $3,600 a year for three years. After the three years, the cart is expected to be worthless. What is the payback period?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单