A firm chooses short-term finance due to uncertain future interest rates. What trade-off is it accepting?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Short-term financing increases flexibility but creates a risk of having to refinance frequently at uncertain future conditions.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Interest rate risk vs. re-funding (rollover) risk: Interest rate risk refers to exposure to changes in rates over the life of a fixed contract; re-funding risk is the danger that, when short-term debt matures, the firm must roll it over under worse terms or cannot refinance at all.  
- Maturity choice trade-off: Short-term finance lets a firm adjust quickly to new rates or conditions (flexibility), while long-term locks in a rate and reduces re-funding uncertainty but sacrifices flexibility.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Firm expects future interest rates to be uncertain. If it takes long-term debt, it locks in a current rate and cannot benefit if rates fall; if it takes short-term debt, it can wait until maturity and then borrow at the prevailing rate.  
- Therefore the firm chooses short-term debt to retain the option to refinance at potentially lower future rates (greater flexibility).  
- However, because the firm must repeatedly refinance as debt matures, it faces the risk that the market at the roll-over time has higher rates or tightened credit—this is re-funding (rollover) risk.

3. Intermediate logical steps (no numeric calculations required)
- Short-term = more frequent refinancing opportunities → can benefit from falling rates.  
- Short-term = more refinancing events → greater chance of encountering adverse market conditions or higher rates when rolling over.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- "Higher flexibility but increased re-funding risk" precisely captures the benefit (ability to adjust to future rates) and the cost (risk of being forced to refinance at worse terms or not at all).

5. Why other options are incorrect
- "Lower flexibility for higher cost": opposite—short-term increases flexibility.  
- "Lower liquidity with higher certainty": short-term does not increase certainty; it increases refinancing uncertainty and typically increases liquidity pressure.  
- "Elimination of interest rate risk": short-term does not eliminate rate-related risk; it shifts exposure into re-funding risk and does not guarantee elimination of rate-related costs.

6. Conclusion
The best description of the trade-off is: Higher flexibility but increased re-funding risk, which matches the provided answer.

A firm chooses short-term finance due to uncertain future interest rates. What trade-off is it accepting?单项选择题

类似问题

The riskiness of an asset’s returns due to interest rate changes is called:

A bank using fixed-rate liabilities to fund variable-rate assets faces the risk of interest rate , and a bank using variable-rate liabilities to fund fixed-rate assets faces the risk of interest rate _.

Which company's valuation is more exposed to interest rate risk, a company which owns a series of rooftop solar installations such as SunNova or SunRun or an E&P company which owns a bunch of oil and gas wells.

In this question, assume all bonds are annual coupon-ed bonds, have the face value of $1,000, have the same credit rating, and are sold at par. Which of the following has the least amount of Interest Rate Risk?

You are analyzing the exposure of U.S. banks’ income to interest rate risk using the intuitions discussed in class. In this context, you considered the statements below. Which of these statements is correct?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单