According to Dodgson et al, innovation management is:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question: According to Dodgson et al, innovation management is:

Option 1: The successful application of new ideas, which results from organizational processes that combine various resources to that end while producing benefits for the organization and its employees, customers, clients and partners; it is an outcome and a process too, a fact and an act.

Option 2: The science of applying new ideas always representing breakthroughs at the cutting edge of science; hence, always successful revolutionary business models, products and services.

Option 3: A framework to combine and coordinate resources like people, knowledge, finance, technology, physical spaces, networks, and their capabilities and skills, aiming to identify the needs of an organization’s employees, customers, clients and partners.

Option 4: Seeking out new ways of achieving results, based on an analytical assessment of past projects.

Option 1 analysis:
- This option frames innovation management as both a process and an outcome, emphasizing the integration of resources to achieve benefits for multiple stakeholders. It captures the dual nature of managing innovation (the activities/processes and the resulting value) which aligns with Dodgson et al.'s view that innovation management involves systematic practices that lead to beneficial results for the organization and its ecosystem.
- The phrase about combining resources (people, knowledge, finance, technology, spaces, networks, and skills) and delivering benefits to employees, customers, clients, and partners reflects a holistic, resource‑oriented perspective typical in innovation management literature.

Option 2 analysis:
- This statement overqualifies and oversimplifies by insisting on breakthroughs at the cutting edge and guaranteed success. In reality, innovation management encompasses both successful and failed attempts, and not all ideas become breakthroughs. Therefore, this option misrepresents the scope and probabilistic nature of managing innovation.

Option 3 analysis:
- While it describes assembling and coordinating resources, the emphasis on identifying the needs of stakeholders makes it sound more like a general resource management framework rather than specifically defining innovation management. It shifts focus toward needs assessment rather than the end-to-end process of pursuing and applying new ideas that create value.

Option 4 analysis:
- This option suggests a narrow, retrospective approach based on past projects, which does capture some empirical aspects of innovation but fails to articulate the proactive, systematic management of innovative ideas and the generation of new value. It neglects the forward‑looking, organizational process elements central to innovation management.

Synthesis:
- Among the options, the first statement best embodies both dimensions highlighted by the literature: innovation management as the deliberate process of applying new ideas through coordinated organizational activities that yield tangible benefits for a broad set of stakeholders. The other options either overstate guarantees, misstate the scope, or describe only a subset of what innovation management encompasses.

According to Dodgson et al, innovation management is: 单项选择题

类似问题

Question at position 1 The Skunkworks approach removes a team from everyday organizational constraints to enhance creativity.TrueFalse

Which of the following is not the reason that companies need innovation?

In managing new product ideas, which of the following allows for a holistic and systematic process?

Incentives and processes used to keep companies focused on their main customers can be a major cause for missing a new technologies or emerging markets.

The success of technological innovation mainly depends on the characteristics of the innovation in question.

The success of technological innovation mainly depends on the characteristics of the innovation in question.

The innovation life cycle view of innovation processes specifically considers the distinction between innovation and invention.

Successful firms often struggle with innovation because they become complacent with their existing strategies and are hesitant to take risks.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单