Diego arrives at his class after the students and teacher have already begun discussing the topic for the day. Diego doesn’t make any contributions during the discussion. Based on what you know, which of the following is (are) inferences about Diego in this situation?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The scenario provides that Diego arrives after discussion has begun and does not contribute at all. This setup invites us to infer why he did not contribute and what can be reasonably concluded about his behavior from these observations.
Option 1: 'He was late getting to class.' This is a plausible inference because arriving after the discussion has started often implies tardiness. However, the stem doesn’t specify how late he was or whether lateness caused his silence, so while this is possible, it isn’t the strongest or唯一 inference directly supported by the data. It could be true, but we don’t have enough evidence to assert it as a definite conclusion.
Option 2: 'He hadn’t read the assignment so he couldn’t contribute.' This inference directly accounts for the observed lack of contribution: if he hadn’t read the assignment, he would likely refrain from speaking during a discussion to avoid giving incorrect or uninformed input. This aligns with typical classroom expectations and offers a concrete reason for his silence that is specifically tied to the content of the task, making it a strong and defensible inference.
Option 3: 'He is often late to class.' Inferring habitual lateness from a single incident is a classic overgeneralization. The fact that he arrived late on this occasion does not by itself establish a pattern of lateness; we would need multiple observations across different days to support a claim about typical behavior. Therefore this is an unwarranted generalization.
Option 4: 'Class began before other students arrived.' The information states that Diego arrived after the students and teacher had already begun discussing, which actually suggests the opposite: the class had already started before he arrived. Therefore this option contradicts the scene as described and is not a valid inference.
In summary, evaluating the options shows that Option 2 provides a specific, content-related explanation for Diego’s silence that fits the described situation, while Options 1 and 3 rely on broader assumptions without sufficient evidence, and Option 4 contradicts the given setup. The reasoning emphasizes distinguishing between plausible inferences and those requiring more information or that conflict with the observed facts.

Diego arrives at his class after the students and teacher have already begun discussing the topic for the day. Diego doesn’t make any contributions during the discussion. Based on what you know, which of the following is (are) inferences about Diego in this situation? 单项选择题

类似问题

Question at position 10 Questions 10-15: Implied meaning and irrelevance Choose the best option. What is the lecturer's opinion about teachers using humour in the classroom?It is essential.It is surprising.It is helpful.

The government of Mauritius has encouraged people to change from using palm oil to soybean oil in cooking. What does this suggest?

15. What can be inferred about SMART work design from Paragraph A?

7. One implication of the information provided in Paragraph D is that the gig economy will

Question at position 18 It can reasonably be inferred from the article that the author _____.opposes the overuse of digital devices such as smartphonesfavors the development of new technologieshas no opinion on the use of technology in society

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单