Multiple choice. (2 pts)

If we consider the comic above, as well as children's behaviour in the "A class divided" video, which of the assigned articles would have predicted both outcomes?

Question

Multiple choice. (2 pts)

If we consider the comic above, as well as children's behaviour in the "A class divided" video, which of the assigned articles would have predicted both outcomes?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks which assigned article would have predicted both outcomes shown in the comic and in the 'A class divided' video. The provided correct answer is Dunham et al., 2011: Consequences of ‘‘Minimal’’ Group Affiliations in Children, so we’ll evaluate all options in turn.
Option 1: Ambady et al., 2001: Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. This study focuses on how activating stereotypes affects children's performance on tasks, highlighting stereotype threat/priming effects. While it illuminates how identity cues can influence performance, it does not specifically center on minimal group affiliations or predict broad social-psychological outcomes from mere group assignment in children in the same way Dunham et al. does. Therefore, it’s not the best fit for predicting minimal-group–related outcomes across contexts like a comic and a classroom video.
Option 2: Dunham et al., 2011: Consequences of ‘‘Minimal’’ Group Affiliations in Children. This article directly examines how children assign social categories based on minimal group cues and how those categorizations influence social attitudes and behaviors toward others, even when the groups are arbitrarily defined. It is designed to predict how minimal group distinctions can lead to bias, in-group favoritism, and differential treatment, aligning with outcomes seen in both the comic and the video. This choice is consistent with the question’s framing about predicting both outcomes.
Option 3: Gelman & Heyman, 1999: Carrot-Eaters and Creature-Believers: The Effects of Lexicalization on Children's Inferences about Social Categories. This work deals with how language and labeling affect children's inferences about social categories, focusing on lexical effects rather than direct predictions about minimal group dynamics or intergroup bias arising from arbitrary group assignments. While informative about language’s role in categorization, it’s not the primary source for predicting minimal-group–driven outcomes across the described media.
Option 4: Gonzalez et al., 2017: Reducing children's implicit racial bias through exposure to positive outgroup exemplars. This study centers on bias reduction strategies by exposing children to positive exemplars of outgroups. Although it relates to intergroup attitudes, it emphasizes interventions and bias reduction rather than predictions about the natural consequences of minimal-group categorization seen in the comic or the video. It’s more treatment-oriented than predictive of the observed outcomes in question.
Option 5: Rudman, 2004: Sources of implicit attitudes. This piece discusses the origins of implicit attitudes broadly, not specifically about how minimal group assignments in childhood predict real-world intergroup outcomes in educational settings or media contexts. While foundational to implicit social cognition, it doesn’t directly align with predicting specific outcomes from minimal group affiliations in children as the Dunham et al. article does.
Option 6: Baron & Banaji, 2006: The development of implicit attitudes: Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6, 10 & adulthood. This research traces the development of implicit attitudes across ages and races, illustrating how early attitudes become ingrained. It’s informative for understanding implicit evaluation trajectories but is not focused on the consequences of minimal group affiliations in young children, nor the exact context of the comic and classroom video outcomes predicted by minimal-group theories.

Multiple choice. (2 pts) If we consider the comic above, as well as children's behaviour in the "A class divided" video, which of the assigned articles would have predicted both outcomes?Single choice

Similar Questions

Which of the following would better predict a person's racial biases?

Question at position 17 Even for a person with good intentions, implicit bias can influence hiring decisions.TrueFalse

Which of the following is FALSE?

Which of the following is FALSE?

Unconscious bias can be described as our fundamental way of encountering the world is driven by a “hard-wired” pattern of making unconscious decisions about others based on what feels safe, likeable, valuable, and competent

According to a study by Dovidio, Kawakami & Gaertner (2002), which if the following is true?

What does the Implicit Association Test (IAT) measure?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler