You are concerned that the Immigration Officer who is deciding your client's visa application is biased. You cannot prove they are biased but their decision-making leads you to suspect they are biased. Question: Which specific Immigration Instruction is relevant to this situation? (1 mark)

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

A1.10.b is the specific Immigration Instruction that applies here because it deals with bias, conflicts of interest and the appearance of partiality in decision‑making.

Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- Administrative fairness requires not only absence of actual bias but also avoidance of circumstances that give rise to a reasonable suspicion of bias (apparent bias).
- Immigration Instructions contain discrete provisions on decision‑maker conduct, conflicts of interest and recusal procedures; the subsection A1.10.b is the one addressing these issues.
- When a client’s representative reasonably suspects bias (even without proof), the correct procedural step is to rely on the instruction that governs impartiality and the process for addressing such concerns.

Step‑by‑step reasoning:
1. The fact pattern: you suspect the deciding Immigration Officer is biased but cannot prove it. That raises the issue of apparent bias or potential conflict of interest, not the substantive visa criteria.
2. Identify which Instruction governs decision‑maker impartiality rather than eligibility criteria. That Instruction is A1.10.b.
3. Apply A1.10.b: it describes the standards for impartiality and the mechanisms to address perceived bias (for example, raising the concern through supervisory channels, requesting reassignment or following the internal complaint/recusal process set out in the Instruction).
4. Because the concern is about the officer’s impartiality, not about evidentiary sufficiency or statutory eligibility, the A1.10.b provision is the directly relevant instruction.

Why the correct answer is correct:
- A1.10.b specifically addresses bias and the appearance of bias by decision‑makers; therefore it is the instruction to consult when suspicion of bias exists.

Why other instructions are not correct:
- Other Immigration Instructions focus on substantive assessment of visa criteria, documentation, or procedural fairness generally, but they do not specifically set out duties and procedures relating to bias/recusal the way A1.10.b does.

Conclusion:
The correct and relevant Immigration Instruction for a suspected (but unproven) bias by an Immigration Officer is A1.10.b. This matches the provided answer.

Similar Questions

Which specific Immigration Instruction states that a practical step toward achieving fairness and natural justice is to distinguish fact from rumour, opinion, allegation or assumption? (1 mark)

Which statement is correct about the definition of potentially prejudicial information for applicants outside of New Zealand? (1 mark)

Which statement is NOT correct about the definition of potentially prejudicial information for applicants in New Zealand? (1 mark)

Which specific Immigration Instruction states that a practical step toward achieving fairness and natural justice is to distinguish fact from rumour, opinion, allegation or assumption? (1 mark)

Which of the following options is NOT a function of Immigration New Zealand: (1 mark)

Which statement is correct about the definition of potentially prejudicial information for applicants outside of New Zealand? (1 mark)

Which statement is NOT correct about the definition of potentially prejudicial information for applicants in New Zealand? (1 mark)

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler