Your client is not fluent in English. Your client will have an interview with an Immigration Officer. You would like an interpreter to attend the interview. Question: Provide a specific reference to an Immigration Instruction which supports an interpreter attending the interview with your client (1 mark):Single choice
A
a. E7.15
B
b. A1
C
c. A1.15
D
d. A1.15.f

Question

Your client is not fluent in English. Your client will have an interview with an Immigration Officer. You would like an interpreter to attend the interview. Question: Provide a specific reference to an Immigration Instruction which supports an interpreter attending the interview with your client (1 mark):Single choice

A

a. E7.15

B

b. A1

C

c. A1.15

D

d. A1.15.f

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

A1.15.f explicitly authorises the presence of an interpreter at interviews where the non‑English‑speaking client requires language assistance.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Immigration Instructions set procedural rules for interviews, including communication needs and use of interpreters.
- Specific subclauses (e.g. A1.15.f) provide more detailed operational guidance than broad chapter headings (e.g. A1).
- When a client is not fluent in English, the correct procedure is to rely on the specific instruction that permits or requires an interpreter to ensure procedural fairness and accurate communication.

2) Step‑by‑step reasoning
- The client cannot communicate fluently in English, so an interpreter is necessary for accurate communication during the interview.
- The correct support for requesting an interpreter must come from the Immigration Instructions that govern interview conduct and language assistance.
- Among the answer choices, A1.15.f is the most specific citation pointing to the subclause dealing with interpreter attendance at interviews.
- A precise subclause is preferable to a whole chapter or an unrelated instruction because exam questions ask for "a specific reference."

3) Calculations or intermediate steps
- No numerical calculations are required. The logical steps are: identify need for interpreter → find the Instruction that addresses interpreter attendance → select the most specific applicable reference (A1.15.f).

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- A1.15.f is a targeted clause within the A1 section that deals with interview procedures and expressly covers interpreter involvement; therefore it is the authoritative and specific reference supporting an interpreter attending.

5) Why the other options are incorrect
- a. E7.15: This is not the relevant instruction for interpreter attendance at interviews (it belongs to a different section).
- b. A1: Too general — a chapter heading rather than the specific clause required by the question.
- c. A1.15: Closer, but still not as specific as A1.15.f; the question asks for a specific reference.

6) Conclusion
The specific Immigration Instruction that supports an interpreter attending the interview is A1.15.f, matching the provided answer (d. A1.15.f).

Similar Questions

Which specific Immigration Instruction states that a practical step toward achieving fairness and natural justice is to distinguish fact from rumour, opinion, allegation or assumption? (1 mark)

Which statement is correct about the definition of potentially prejudicial information for applicants outside of New Zealand? (1 mark)

Which statement is NOT correct about the definition of potentially prejudicial information for applicants in New Zealand? (1 mark)

You are concerned that the Immigration Officer who is deciding your client's visa application is biased. You cannot prove they are biased but their decision-making leads you to suspect they are biased. Question: Which specific Immigration Instruction is relevant to this situation? (1 mark)

Which specific Immigration Instruction states that a practical step toward achieving fairness and natural justice is to distinguish fact from rumour, opinion, allegation or assumption? (1 mark)

Which of the following options is NOT a function of Immigration New Zealand: (1 mark)

Which statement is correct about the definition of potentially prejudicial information for applicants outside of New Zealand? (1 mark)

Which statement is NOT correct about the definition of potentially prejudicial information for applicants in New Zealand? (1 mark)

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler