Firm JKL and Firm MNO are two firms in an oligopoly market. Table 2 shows possible profit outcomes for each firm for various combinations of pricing decisions. Table 2: Summary of Possible Profit Outcomes for Firms in an Oligopoly Market [table]
| Firm JKL Charge a high price | Charge a low price Firm MNO | Charge a high price | Both firms earn $80 million profit each | Firm JKL earns $120 million profit; Firm MNO earns $20 million profit Charge a low price | Firm JKL earns $20 million profit; Firm MNO earns $120 million profit | Both firms earn $40 million profit each
[/table] Firm JKL and Firm MNO choose to cooperate. If Firm JKL cheats on Firm MNO, what would be the likely outcome?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

If JKL defects while MNO continues to cooperate (i.e., MNO keeps the high price), JKL undercuts MNO and receives $120 million; MNO receives $20 million.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Oligopoly payoff matrix: each cell lists profits for (Firm MNO, Firm JKL) given their pricing choices.  
- Cooperation (collusion) typically means both choose the high price to maximize joint profits.  
- Cheating (defection) means one firm breaks the agreement by choosing the low price to gain market share and a higher individual profit.

2) Step-by-step reasoning using the payoff matrix
- When both cooperate (both charge high prices) the payoff cell shows both earn $80M each. That is the cooperative outcome.  
- If JKL cheats, it chooses the low-price strategy while MNO remains at the high price. Locate the matrix cell for (MNO: high price, JKL: low price).  
- The cell corresponding to MNO = high, JKL = low reports: Firm JKL earns $120M profit; Firm MNO earns $20M profit.

3) Intermediate steps / mapping to numbers
- Cooperative cell: (High, High) -> ($80M, $80M).  
- Defection scenario: (MNO High, JKL Low) -> (MNO $20M, JKL $120M). Reading order in the table is MNO first, JKL second; the question asks for JKL cheating so we report JKL then MNO as in the answer choice: JKL $120M, MNO $20M.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Undercutting the rival while the rival maintains a high price allows the cheater to capture much of the market, increasing its profit to $120M and reducing the cooperator’s profit to $20M. This directly matches the payoff matrix.

5) Why other options are incorrect
- (a) reverses payoffs (this would be MNO cheating).  
- (c) $80M each is the outcome when both cooperate (no cheating).  
- (d) $40M each is when both charge low prices (mutual defection).

Conclusion: The correct outcome is b. Firm JKL will earn $120 million; Firm MNO will earn $20 million, matching the provided answer.

类似问题

Question at position 13 In the hybrid form of the combination structure, some divisions are oriented toward products while others are oriented toward market areasTrueFalse

Question at position 3 Weak ............................... protection in some countries implies that firms should expand overseas rapidly in order to preempt imitatorsproductpatentpolicyNone of the Above

Question at position 1 Netflix is trying to foster more growth by partnering with firms such as .............. for access to its hotel entertainment systems.Pearl ContinentalMcDonalds MarriottAll of the Above

If CPI in 2016 was 300, and CPI in 2017 was 312, what is the annual rate of inflation?

What is a budget deficit?

Refer to Figure 1 below and answer the question that follows: Figure 1: Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism Which combination best fits into boxes 2, 3 and 4, respectively?

Which of the following factors may lead to demand-pull inflation?

Last year Amali earned $60,000 salary. This year, her income was $62,000. Inflation in the economy in the last year was 7%. Which of the following statement is true?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单