What are some examples of environmental likelihood (not causal) factors associated with autism that may interact with genetic/ neurobiological factors? There are multiple correct answers.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Advanced parental age (particularly increased paternal age) is a robust epidemiologic correlate of increased autism likelihood, plausibly interacting with genetic and neurobiological mechanisms (e.g., increased de novo mutations, epigenetic changes).

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Epidemiologic association versus causation: an “environmental likelihood” factor correlates with higher observed risk but is not necessarily a proven direct causal agent.  
- Biological plausibility for older parental age: older paternal (and to a lesser extent maternal) age is linked to a higher rate of de novo genetic mutations in sperm/ova and to epigenetic changes that can interact with inherited susceptibilities.  
- Distinction from teratogenic or strongly causal prenatal exposures (e.g., valproate), and from perinatal complications where confounding is common.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- Step 1: Identify which answer choices are known associations. Older parental age is consistently reported across studies as associated with elevated autism risk.  
- Step 2: Consider mechanism: older parental age increases de novo mutation burden and epigenetic alterations, providing a clear pathway for interaction with neurodevelopmental genetic vulnerability—fits the “likelihood” (interaction) model.  
- Step 3: Evaluate the other options against the prompt’s qualifier “not causal.” Some factors are either inconsistently associated (gestational diabetes, hypoxia) or are considered teratogenic/causal (valproate).

3) Intermediate logical steps (no numeric calculation)
- Association present → plausible genetic interaction (de novo mutations) → qualifies as an environmental likelihood factor.
- Stronger causal agents or inconsistent/confounded associations do not fit the “likelihood (not causal)” label as cleanly.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
Older parental age meets the criteria: it is an environmental/social variable that correlates with autism risk and has plausible interaction routes with genetic/neurobiological factors (de novo mutations), while not being a definitive single causal exposure.

5) Why other options are incorrect
- a. Gestational diabetes: associations are inconsistent and likely confounded; evidence is not as robust and may be mediated by metabolic factors—so not a classic “likelihood (not causal)” example.  
- b. Hypoxia: perinatal hypoxia has been linked in some studies but is often confounded by other obstetric complications; evidence for a consistent non-causal likelihood factor is weaker.  
- d. Some medications in pregnancy (e.g., valproate): valproate is considered a teratogen with a stronger causal risk for neurodevelopmental disorders, so it is not classed as a non-causal “likelihood” factor.

Conclusion: The best choice that matches the prompt’s “environmental likelihood (not causal) factor” is c. Older parental age, which matches the provided answer.

What are some examples of environmental likelihood (not causal) factors associated with autism that may interact with genetic/ neurobiological factors? There are multiple correct answers.单项选择题

类似问题

Of the following psychologists, who is most likely to agree with the Gene --> Environment theory?

If a study found that adults interact more with attractive infants leading those children to become more outgoing, then it would be concluded that the children's outgoingness is a product of

Through advanced genetic screening, Todd was informed that he had the genetic potential to grow to 6'5. However, at age 35, Todd stands at about 5'10. Taking into account gene/environment interactions, how is this scenario best explained?

Emily has been taking her son Joshua (currently 2 years old) to the petting zoo since he was born, and continues to do so because she finds it makes him happy. This is an example of which Genotype --> Environment effect(s)? Choose the best answer.

Based on the findings from Caspi et al. (2002) in which researchers examined MAOA activity in adults who had experienced no, probable, or severe maltreatment as children, how would you best answer the question "Is aggression learned?"

Even if a gene has a strong relationship to a particular phenotype, that characteristic may not show itself if a person's experiences do not lead the gene to express itself. This reflects which of the following principles?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单