The short-run level effect of this influx of immigrants on GDP per capita is
[ Select ]
positive
negative
zero
.

Question

The short-run level effect of this influx of immigrants on GDP per capita is 
[ Select ]
positive
negative
zero
 .

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We are evaluating the short-run impact of an influx of immigrants on GDP per capita, choosing among: positive, negative, or zero.
Option 1: positive. Why this might be considered incorrect: in the short run, a sudden larger labor supply could temporarily depress average productivity or capital deepening effects may not yet materialize, and if the economy is near full employment the immediate impact could reduce GDP per capita. However, claiming a universal short-run positive effect ignores potential displacements, crowding of jobs, or transitional costs, making this option less convincing.
Option 2: negative. This option can be supported by standard short-run growth accounting intuition: an influx of workers raises the denominator (population) faster than the numerator (GDP) if output doesn't rise proportionally right away, reducing GDP per capita. In the short run, there may be insufficient capital stock or demand to absorb new workers at high productivity, leading to a drop in per-capita output. Additionally, if the economy operates near capacity, the immediate boost to overall GDP could be limited, so per-capita GDP could fall.
Option 3: zero. This would imply that GDP per capita remains unchanged despite more people, which would require perfectly offsetting increases in total GDP alongside population, or immediate proportional scaling of output with population. In the short run, such precise scaling is unlikely due to adjustment frictions, delays in capital deepening, and potential underutilization of new labor, making a zero effect an unlikely general outcome.
In sum, the most plausible short-run outcome given a sudden immigration influx is that GDP per capita falls or decreases somewhat, because population rises and output does not instantaneously scale up in lockstep. The negative result reflects common short-run transitional dynamics, while the positive and zero options rely on stronger assumptions about instantaneous productivity gains or perfectly proportional growth that are less typically observed in the short run.
Therefore, the reasoning supports interpreting the negative option as the appropriate short-run effect, with the other two options requiring more specific conditions to hold true in the immediate period.

The short-run level effect of this influx of immigrants on GDP per capita is [ Select ] positive negative zero .Multiple dropdown selections

Similar Questions

A country will experience a decreasing real GDP per capita if the rate of population growth is slower than the rate of increase in real GDP.

Real GDP per capita is found by

One indicator of a country's productivity is Blank ______.

Compute this economy's GDP per capita in the long run. Round your answer to the nearest tenth.

If Country A’s GDP is $500 billion and its population is 50 million, and Country B’s GDP is $1 trillion with a population of 200 million, which has the higher GDP per capita?

If real GDP grew by 6 percent and population grew by 2 percent, then real GDP per person grew by approximately ______ percent.

Country X has a population of 100 million and a GDP of $500 billion in 2017. Country Y has a population of 40 million and a GDP of $400 billion in 2017. Which economic measure would be most appropriate to make a comparison of the relative economic prosperity of each country?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler