John was the accounts payable officer at Living Good furniture. He was responsible for verifying and paying invoices received from suppliers. Since the business has a number of small staff, John did both invoice verification and issuing supplier payments. Recently, the supplier manager was away on long service leave, so John was also given the responsibility of maintaining the supplier master data. Living Good Furniture’s annual leave policy requires employees to take holidays when their leave balance reaches 30 days. Consequently, John was forced to take annual leave. The employee who covered his job was reviewing some previously paid invoices. They discovered that these invoices related to non-existent suppliers and the payment was going to a shelf company that had been created by John. It was also discovered that John had some significant gambling debts and was using the funds to support his gambling problem. During his court case, John said that he always thought of the cash payments as a loan he would pay back.[Fill in the blank] Analyse this case using the fraud triangle. Clearly identify: i. The dimensions of the fraud triangle, and (3 marks)ii. How the dimensions apply to this case (9 marks)[Fill in the blank] Explain how the control environment at Living Good furniture helped to identify this fraud. Your answer should include: i. A brief description of what the control environment is (2 marks) ii. A brief analysis of how the control environment led to the fraud being identified. (3 marks)[Fill in the blank]Multiple fill-in-the-blank