In 44 Liquormart v. Rhode Island, a liquor store argued that a law banning alcohol-price advertising was unconstitutional. Which of the following is the most accurate description of the Court's holding? 单项选择题

The Court held that the law was constitutional because people would drive from Connecticut to Rhode Island to purchase liquor, and therefore the law satisfied the "interstate" aspect of the Commerce Clause.

The Court held that the law was constitutional because it was narrowly tailored to directly advance a substantial government interest.

The Court held that the law was unconstitutional because it violated the plaintiff's rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The Court held that the law was unconstitutional because Rhode Island lacked authority under the Commerce Clause to enact the state law in question.

The Court held that the law was constitutional because the Twenty-First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gives states broad authority to regulate alcohol sales.