What best describes the foetal growth pattern in multiparous pregnancies?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To tackle the question, I’ll examine what each option claims about fetal growth in multiparous pregnancies and how it links to muscle development.
Option 1: 'Multiparous lambs had smaller muscles as they had less muscle fibres' This aligns with the idea that the number of muscle fibres (myofibres) is largely determined prenatally, and a reduction in fibre number can lead to smaller overall muscle mass. If multiparous pregnancies allocate nutrients differently or experience competition among fetuses, it can limit myogenesis, resulting in fewer muscle fibres and smaller muscles. This option provides a mechanistic link between parity, fibre number, and muscle size.
Option 2: 'Multiparous lambs had smaller muscles as they were physically smaller' While logically plausible that overall body size relates to muscle size, this statement is tautological and doesn’t specify a biological mechanism or direct link to fetal muscle fibre development. It describes a correlation with no causal detail about muscle fibre formation, making it less precise than Option 1.
Option 3: 'Multiparous lambs were smaller as they had smaller muscle fibres' Here the claim flips the causal direction: the primary issue is the size of the muscle fibres themselves rather than the quantity of fibres. In many developmental scenarios, fibre number is established prenatally and fibre size (hypertrophy) occurs postnatally; this option introduces a mechanism (smaller fibres) that may not reflect the reported pattern if the study emphasized fibre number over fibre size.
Option 4: 'None of the muscle measurements in Experiment 2 are important as they did not influence live weight' This is an overgeneralization that dismisses the relevance of muscle measurements to growth. If the experiment found differences in muscle development with parity that relate to overall growth or carcass characteristics, declaring them unimportant would ignore observed data.
In summary, Option 1 provides a coherent explanation grounded in established developmental biology: fewer muscle fibres can lead to smaller muscles, and parity effects may influence fetal myogenesis. The other options either rely on circular reasoning, misstate the primary developmental mechanism, or dismiss potentially meaningful measurements without justification.

What best describes the foetal growth pattern in multiparous pregnancies?单项选择题

类似问题

According to Xenophanes, what should be avoided at a symposium?

What is "kottabos"?

Why are there so many naked figures in vase iconography?

Why was it necessary to have a "hydria" as part of the ceramic vessels used at a symposium?

For what uses other than sympotic were Greek ceramic vessels used?

Question textFill in the gap with ONE word from the text. Research can help to reduce the amount of Answer 1 Question 6[input] between fauna and humans.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单