London argues that we should integrate AI into medicine because (Check BOTH that apply)

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: London argues for integrating AI into medicine and asks you to check all statements that apply.
Option 1: 'Because requiring that AI be interpretable may be requiring more from it than we require from human decisions.' This line of reasoning emphasizes that demanding full interpretability from AI could impose greater constraints on machine reasoning than we typically expect from human clinicians, suggesting a practical humility about what interpretability feasibly demands. It also points to a comparison between human and machine decision-making burdens, which is central to the integration argument.
Option 2: 'Because automating the diagnostic process will increase efficiency in the medical system and decrease costs for consumers.' While efficiency and cost reduction are appealing outcomes, this claim reflects a practical, policy-oriented benefit rather than a core theoretical justification for why AI should be integrated in medicine from London’s perspective. It is not the kind of epistemic or methodological justification London emphasizes about AI’s role in medicine.
Option 3: 'Because physicians are often plagued by bias, and AI does not contain any biases.' This statement is inaccurate in both parts. AI systems can reflect data biases and designer biases, and asserting that AI contains no biases is incorrect. The claim mischaracterizes the bias landscape in AI and oversimplifies bias mitigation, which weakens its suitability as a justification.
Option 4: 'The opaque, atheoretical, and associationist reasoning it uses is more common in medicine than critics recognize.' This option aligns with London’s critique of AI’s opacity and the kind of reasoning it embodies (often pattern-based, data-driven, and not always grounded in explicit theories). He argues that such reasoning is more embedded in medical practice than critics acknowledge, making this a valid justification for integrating AI.
Summary note: Options 1 and 4 address foundational epistemic and methodological considerations about AI in medicine, while Options 2 and 3 lean on practical or inaccurate claims that do not capture London’s central arguments.

London argues that we should integrate AI into medicine because (Check BOTH that apply)多项选择题

类似问题

What are critics of AI skeptical about its use in medicine?

Why is explainability especially critical when using AI systems to assist with medical diagnoses?

Question9Question 9Inline Choice Question Try selecting one of the choices from the drop down menu: The capital of New South Wales is [select: , Tasmania, Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne]. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question 30 Choose a, b, c or d as the best answer. The author’s main argument is that the 100:80:100 model __________.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单