Question at position 3 Based on the data table and the answers given so far, is bleaching a water supply with a positive result a good use of resources? You must pick two: one statement if there is another test and one statement if not.yes, if there is another assay test availableno, if there is another assay availablemaybe, if there is another assay availableyes, if there is no other assay availableno, if there is no other assay available多项选择题
A
yes, if there is another assay test available
B
no, if there is another assay available
C
maybe, if there is another assay available
D
yes, if there is no other assay available
E
no, if there is no other assay available

Question

Question at position 3 Based on the data table and the answers given so far, is bleaching a water supply with a positive result a good use of resources? You must pick two: one statement if there is another test and one statement if not.yes, if there is another assay test availableno, if there is another assay availablemaybe, if there is another assay availableyes, if there is no other assay availableno, if there is no other assay available多项选择题

A

yes, if there is another assay test available

B

no, if there is another assay available

C

maybe, if there is another assay available

D

yes, if there is no other assay available

E

no, if there is no other assay available

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Diagnostic test characteristics: sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, and positive predictive value (PPV). PPV determines the probability a positive test truly indicates contamination.
- Risk–benefit and resource-allocation principles: costs of bleaching (money, labor, disruption) vs public-health benefit of preventing exposure.
- Value of confirmatory testing: a second assay increases confidence before a costly intervention.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- A single positive assay can be a true positive or a false positive. The likelihood it is true depends on PPV.
- PPV = (sensitivity × prevalence) / [(sensitivity × prevalence) + (1 − specificity) × (1 − prevalence)].
- If prevalence is low and specificity <100%, PPV can be low → many positives will be false. In that case, performing another independent assay before using resources to bleach is sensible (hence “maybe” if another assay is available).
- If no alternative assay exists, you must weigh uncertainty against the health risk. For serious contamination with high potential harm, the precautionary principle favors treating (bleaching) despite uncertainty — so “yes” if there is no other assay available.

3. Example calculation (intermediate steps)
- Assume prevalence 1%, sensitivity 95%, specificity 95%:
  - Numerator = 0.95 × 0.01 = 0.0095
  - False-positive term = (1 − 0.95) × 0.99 = 0.05 × 0.99 = 0.0495
  - PPV = 0.0095 / (0.0095 + 0.0495) = 0.0095 / 0.059 = 0.161 ≈ 16%
- With PPV ≈16%, most positives are false → confirmatory testing advisable if available.

4. Why the correct answers are correct
- “Maybe, if there is another assay available”: confirms the need to consider confirmatory testing and context; bleaching is conditional on confirmatory results and risk tolerance.
- “Yes, if there is no other assay available”: with no way to confirm and potential severe harm, precaution supports bleaching.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- “Yes, if there is another assay available”: wrong because you shouldn’t automatically expend resources before confirming.
- “No, if there is another assay available”: wrong because a positive test should prompt at least confirmation and possibly action depending on results.
- “No, if there is no other assay available”: wrong because it ignores precaution when confirmation is impossible and risk to public health may be high.

6. Conclusion
The recommended choices—“maybe, if there is another assay available” and “yes, if there is no other assay available”—match the provided answers.

类似问题

Match the terminology to the situation: I. A study with random allocation allows us to make a strong causal inference. II. Results from a study run in a laboratory may not be applicable to the real world.

Which type of study is most likely to avoid confounding variables?

In a pilot study, the student observed that completing the tasks takes a long time, leading to participant fatigue and boredom. And also, observed that some participants learned the tasks quickly, affecting subsequent trials. What suggestion(s) below do you recommend to the student?

Manipulative experiments are those in which at least some of the conditions are Blank ______.

Considering the series of experiments in which oats are present in the recipe:

____ methods allow a researcher to make a valid cause-and-effect statement about the variables in her study.

Select All That Apply: What should predictions tell you?

In principle, the purpose of random assignment is to make sure that research participants:

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单