Executive compensation is a governance mechanism that seeks to align managers' and owners' interests through all of the following EXCEPT:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Bonuses and stock-based pay are classic pay-for-performance tools, and base salary is part of the compensation package used to attract and retain managers; a direct punitive “penalty” for poor firm performance is not a standard alignment device.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Principal–agent problem: owners (principals) want managers (agents) to act in shareholders’ interests. Executive compensation is designed to reduce divergence between manager incentives and owner goals.  
- Common contractual tools: (a) bonuses tied to short‑term performance metrics, (b) base salary as cash compensation and risk/retention device, (d) long‑term incentives (stock grants, options, restricted stock) that tie manager wealth to firm value.  
- Negative sanctions exist (termination, litigation, clawbacks) but explicit direct monetary “penalties” for inadequate performance are not a standard compensation instrument.

2) Step‑by‑step reasoning
- Examine each option:  
  a. Bonuses: Typically linked to revenue, profit, EPS or other KPIs. They reward managers when firm results improve, aligning manager behavior with owner objectives. Therefore bonuses are an alignment mechanism.  
  b. Salary: Although salary is fixed pay and not performance‑contingent, it remains a central element of compensation used to attract and retain talent and to place managers on the firm’s payroll structure; combined with performance pay it supports the overall incentive package. Thus salary is part of governance via compensation design.  
  d. Long‑term incentives such as stock options: These directly tie managers’ personal wealth to stock price and long‑run firm value, strongly aligning interests.  
  c. Penalties for inadequate firm performance: Explicit, contractually imposed monetary penalties for poor performance are uncommon. Firms favor positive incentives (bonuses, equity) and corrective measures (firing, demotion, clawbacks, reduced future pay). Direct penalties can be legally complex, demotivating, and hard to measure fairly.

3) Calculations/intermediate steps
- No numerical calculation is required; reasoning is conceptual comparing mechanisms.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- The typical governance toolkit emphasizes pay‑for‑performance (bonuses, equity) and retention (salary). Direct monetary penalties as a compensation mechanism are not standard practice; instead remedies for poor performance are usually non‑monetary (dismissal) or conditional recovery (clawbacks), so “Penalties for inadequate firm performance” is the exception.

5) Why other options are incorrect
- a. Bonuses: Incorrect as an exception because they are commonly used to align interests.  
- b. Salary: Incorrect as an exception because salary is a standard component of executive compensation (even if not performance‑contingent).  
- d. Long‑term incentives: Incorrect as an exception because stock options and similar grants are primary alignment tools.

Conclusion: The correct answer is C, Penalties for inadequate firm performance, which matches the provided answer.

Executive compensation is a governance mechanism that seeks to align managers' and owners' interests through all of the following EXCEPT:单项选择题

类似问题

24. A high-earning CEO or executive can earn:

Which element of executive pay is most likely to include some metric based on ESG performance?

Providing stock options to corporate managers was an idea designed to:

Which of the following statements regarding compensation policies is FALSE?

Which of the following statements regarding compensation policies is FALSE?

Which of the following statements regarding compensation policies is FALSE?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单