Question at position 3 Based on your calculations, is the occurrence of the nos gene independent of being a centenarian?No because the product of the marginal probabilities is equal to the probability of their intersectionNo because the product of the marginal probabilities is not equal to the probability of their intersectionYes because the product of the marginal probabilities is equal to the probability of their intersectionYes because the product of the marginal probabilities is not equal to the probability of their intersectionBlackTom题目解析

Question

Question at position 3 Based on your calculations, is the occurrence of the nos gene independent of being a centenarian?No because the product of the marginal probabilities is equal to the probability of their intersectionNo because the product of the marginal probabilities is not equal to the probability of their intersectionYes because the product of the marginal probabilities is equal to the probability of their intersectionYes because the product of the marginal probabilities is not equal to the probability of their intersectionBlackTom题目解析

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, restating the core idea in play: we’re evaluating whether the nos gene occurring in a person is independent of being a centenarian, using the criterion of independence that relies on probability products.
Option 1: 'No because the product of the marginal probabilities is equal to the probability of their intersection.' If the product of the marginals did equal the intersection probability, that would indicate independence. Here the claim asserts equality, which would support independence. However, the statement as given is a declaration about equality without acknowledging whether that equality actually holds in the data. In many practical problems, equality of marginals to the joint product is not guaranteed, so this option seems to misuse the independence criterion by assuming the equality holds.
Option 2: 'No because the product of the marginal probabilities is not equal to the probability of their intersection.' This aligns with the standard test for independence: if P(A and B) ≠ P(A)P(B), then A and B are not independent. Therefore, this option claims a dependence between nos gene occurrence and being a centenarian, which would indeed justify that they are not independent.
Option 3: 'Yes because the product of the marginal probabilities is equal to the probability of their intersection.' This asserts independence by equality of joint and product of marginals. As with Option 1, the correctness hinges on actual data. If the equality does not hold, this option is incorrect. Since the given correct choice states that the product is not equal, this option would be false in this scenario.
Option 4: 'Yes because the product of the marginal probabilities is not equal to the probability of their intersection.' This mixes up the logic: independence is about equality (P(A and B) = P(A)P(B)). If the product is not equal, that indicates dependence, so labeling it as 'Yes' for independence is incorrect. This option contradicts the formal criterion for independence.
To summarize the reasoning for each choice, we’re scrutinizing the independence condition P(A ∩ B) = P(A)P(B). When the product of marginals does not equal the joint probability, A and B are not independent; that is the standard cue for dependence rather than independence. In this problem, the statement that the product is not equal to the intersection probability correctly indicates dependence, which rules out independence.
Hence, the option asserting the non-equality (Option 2) correctly identifies the dependence between the nos gene occurrence and being a centenarian, while the options claiming independence or equality (Options 1 and 3) are incorrect in this context, and the final option incorrectly combines a non-equality with an affirmation of independence (Option 4).

Similar Questions

Are the event that a student chooses the finance option and the event that she chooses the co-op stream independent?

True / False: If two events are mutually exclusive, they must also be independent.

Suppose events A and B are assumed to be independent, but when calculated, P(A and B) \neq P(A) × P(B). What does this suggest?

Suppose events A and B are assumed to be independent, but when calculated, P(A and B) \neq P(A) × P(B). What does this suggest?

Suppose a person is chosen at random. Use your understanding about football to decide whether the event that the person weighs more than 300 pounds and the event that the person plays professional football are independent or associated.

Suppose a person is chosen at random. Use your understanding about football to decide whether the event that the person weighs more than 300 pounds and the event that the person plays professional football are independent or associated.

Expected co-occurrences for events A and B (computed under the assumption that the two events are independent) are largely different from observed co-occurrences for these two events. What conclusion can you make? Choose one best answer:

True or False. All independent events are disjoint.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler