In a genetics tutorial, a tutor comments that mature age students take up a disproportionate amount of teaching time and resources for student support. She says “It would be better if they weren’t admitted with such outdated qualifications”.

Is the tutor’s statement appropriate at the University of Melbourne?

Question

In a genetics tutorial, a tutor comments that mature age students take up a disproportionate amount of teaching time and resources for student support. She says “It would be better if they weren’t admitted with such outdated qualifications”.

Is the tutor’s statement appropriate at the University of Melbourne?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The tutor’s remark targets a protected characteristic (age) and is discriminatory and inconsistent with the University’s expectations for staff conduct and student support, so the correct response is No.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Age is a protected attribute under anti‑discrimination law and university equity policies. 
- University values and codes of conduct require respectful, non‑discriminatory treatment of students and equitable access to education and support. 
- Staff have a duty to foster an inclusive learning environment and not to vilify or stigmatise groups of students. 
- Academic freedom does not justify discriminatory or harassing language.

2. Step‑by‑step reasoning
- The tutor singled out “mature age students” and suggested they should not be admitted because of “outdated qualifications.” That is a negative generalisation about a group defined by age/status. 
- Such a statement treats a protected group unfavourably and can create a hostile or exclusionary learning environment for those students. 
- University policy and anti‑discrimination law oblige staff to avoid discriminatory remarks and to provide reasonable support to students with diverse backgrounds and qualifications. 
- Therefore the comment is inappropriate in that it breaches those professional and legal expectations.

3. Calculations/Intermediate steps
- Not applicable.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- The answer No is correct because the tutor’s comment is discriminatory, undermines equity and inclusion obligations, and conflicts with staff responsibilities to support all students regardless of age or prior qualifications.

5. Why the other option (Yes) is incorrect
- Saying the comment is appropriate would ignore legal and policy protections, condone stereotyping and exclusion, and excuse behaviour the University explicitly prohibits.

6. Conclusion
- The tutor’s statement is not appropriate at the University of Melbourne. Final answer: No.

类似问题

Question 29 - 30. Choose A, B or C as the best answer. 29. Which statement is the speaker most likely to agree with?

Question 29 - 30. Choose A, B or C as the best answer. 29. Which statement is the speaker most likely to agree with?

Question 29 - 30. Choose A, B or C as the best answer. 29. Which statement is the speaker most likely to agree with?

Question 29 - 30. Choose A, B or C as the best answer. 29. Which statement is the speaker most likely to agree with?

25. Education policies influence technology by:

12. What is the best title for this mini-lecture?

12. What is the best title for this mini-lecture?

12. What is the best title for this mini-lecture?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单