In an experiment during the 1960s, young children were divided into two groups on their ability (or lack of ability) to postpone the immediate gratification of eating one marshmallow in order to get two marshmallows later. Years later the group that was able to postpone gratification scored, on average, 210 points higher on the SAT (Scholastic Aptitude Test) than did the group that chose immediate gratification.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a classic description tying delayed gratification in childhood to later academic performance.
Option 1: True. The marshmallow-delay paradigm from the 1960s experiments showed that children who could wait tended to have better outcomes later, and some reports state that the waitful group scored, on average, about 210 points higher on the SAT than the immediate-gratification group. This aligns with the general idea that self-control and future-oriented thinking can predict later success in standardized metrics like the SAT, though the exact size of the effect can vary across studies and analyses.
Option 2: False. This would require that the original findings either showed no difference or a negative difference, or that the effect size was far different from 210 points. However, the widely cited follow-up analyses and summaries of the marshmallow study indicate a positive association between delay ability and later achievement, including SAT performance, making a blanket claim of no effect unlikely.
To assess validity, consider the core concept: self-control and the ability to delay gratification are linked to longer-term outcomes such as academic achievement, impulse control, and goal-directed behavior. While the precise magnitude (210 points) may be debated or adjusted in different meta-analyses, the direction of the relationship—better self-control predicting higher later performance—remains supported in the literature. The statement, in its positive framing and numeric claim, corresponds to one commonly cited interpretation of the marshmallow study's longitudinal findings.
In contrast, if one were to choose False, the critique would center on either disputing the existence of a link, disputing the methodology, or disputing the numerical estimate. But given the historical context and recurring reports of the positive association and the notable, specific figure, the False option rests on an incorrect assertion about the study’s conclusions.
Overall, the reasoning supports the interpretation that the statement is True, acknowledging that real-world effects can be nuanced and that exact numbers may vary between reports and replication efforts.

Similar Questions

According to the data on delay of gratification shown in class, which of the following is FALSE? Delay of gratification

Which of the following is NOT a finding from the longitudinal studies of delay of gratification?

Which of the following undermined children's ability refrain from eating treats such as marshmallows in the delay of gratification paradigm?

Which of the following is TRUE about the findings from the delay of gratification studies conducted with children?

Question at position 3 What did Mischel's marshmallow test measure?What did Mischel's marshmallow test measure?None of these responses are correct.How long it takes to squeeze a marshmallow.The ability to delay gratification.Whether marshmallows taste better in the morning or the evening.

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler