In VanHierden v. Swelstad, a man sued his surgeon because the surgeon said "we're going to get rid of your pain," yet the man's pain continued after the surgery. Which of the following is most true about the Court's reasoning?

Question

In VanHierden v. Swelstad, a man sued his surgeon because the surgeon said "we're going to get rid of your pain," yet the man's pain continued after the surgery. Which of the following is most true about the Court's reasoning?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

A surgeon's casual assurance that "we're going to get rid of your pain" is treated as non-contractual opinion or "puffery" unless accompanied by a clear, definite promise or warranty — that is the controlling concept.

Relevant knowledge points:
- Contract formation requires a definite offer, acceptance, and mutual assent to specific terms (meeting of the minds).
- Statements of professional opinion or predictions ordinarily do not create a binding warranty.
- A signed consent or disclaimer that explicitly states no guarantees were made negates any reasonable reliance on an informal assurance.
- Tort claims (battery, negligence) have different elements: battery requires lack of consent; negligence requires duty, breach, causation, and damages.

Step-by-step reasoning applied to VanHierden v. Swelstad:
1. Identify the alleged promise: the surgeon's remark, "we're going to get rid of your pain," is an aspirational statement, not a detailed, measurable promise about outcome or method.
2. Examine written materials: the patient signed a document stating that no guarantees had been made concerning the results of the operation. That disclaimer undermines any claim that the surgeon made a contractual guarantee.
3. Determine whether a reasonable person could construe the remark as a definite contractual term. The court found it was not definite enough and, combined with the express disclaimer, did not create an enforceable contract to cure pain.
4. Conclude there was no meeting of the minds and thus no enforceable contract.

Why the correct answer is correct:
- The court relied on the signed document disclaiming guarantees and the nonbinding nature of the surgeon's remark. That combination defeats a claim that a contract to cure the pain was formed.

Why the other options are incorrect:
- Option 2 (contract formed but failure to prove pain remained) is wrong because the court did not find a contract in the first place.
- Option 3 (contract formed but no damages because insurance paid) is incorrect for the same reason, and insurance payment does not automatically negate damages.
- Option 4 (no contract because pain is too subjective) is incorrect: the court focused on the disclaimer and lack of definite promise, not on subjectivity of pain.
- Option 5 (surgeon liable for battery) is wrong because the patient consented and the ruling addressed contract formation, not battery.

Conclusion: The court held that no contract to cure the man's pain was formed because the man signed a document saying that no guarantees had been made concerning the results of the operation, matching the provided answer.

In VanHierden v. Swelstad, a man sued his surgeon because the surgeon said "we're going to get rid of your pain," yet the man's pain continued after the surgery. Which of the following is most true about the Court's reasoning?单项选择题

类似问题

Sabin and Tyler agree while talking on the phone to form a partnership. Their partnership agreement is legally binding

Generally, when determining whether a contract exists the ________ intent of the parties is not relevant; rather, what matters is how they represented their intent through their actions and words.

If X makes an offer to Y, which of the following is not an effective means of communicating acceptance?

Which of the following is true of intent to form a contract?

You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,021.61. The bond matures in 11 years. What is the yield to maturity?

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单