A student reviewing this experiment notes that the seeds differ from the vegetables in more ways than just protein content (e.g., fat content, caloric density). This is an example of:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Differences in fat content and caloric density between seeds and vegetables act as confounding variables that can obscure whether observed effects are due to protein content or to those other differences.

Relevant concepts:
- Confounding variable: an extraneous factor that varies with the independent variable and can affect the dependent variable, making causal attribution ambiguous.
- Independent variable: the single factor intentionally varied by the experimenter to test its effect.
- Negative control: a group expected not to show the experimental effect, used to check for background signals.
- Qualitative data: non-numeric descriptions or categories.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. The implied independent variable in the study is “type of food” (seeds vs vegetables) or perhaps their protein content. For a clean test of protein’s effect, protein content should be isolated as the only systematic difference between groups.
2. Seeds and vegetables differ not only in protein but also in fat content, calories, fiber, etc. Those additional differences co-vary with the independent variable (food type).
3. If an outcome (e.g., growth, satiety) differs between groups, one cannot determine whether the cause is protein content or one of the other differing properties. That exactly fits the definition of a confounding variable — an uncontrolled factor that may complicate conclusions.
4. To fix this, the experiment would need to control for or hold constant fat/caloric density or use purified protein treatments.

Why the correct answer is correct:
- Option d explicitly names a confounding variable, which matches the situation where multiple differing factors could influence results.

Why other options are incorrect:
- a (Qualitative data): The issue described is about uncontrolled variables, not whether data are descriptive vs numeric.
- b (Well-defined independent variable): The independent variable is not well-isolated; multiple properties vary, so this is false.
- c (Negative control): No negative control is described; the concern is confounding, not the absence of an expected effect.

Conclusion: The best choice is d. A confounding variable that may complicate the conclusions.

A student reviewing this experiment notes that the seeds differ from the vegetables in more ways than just protein content (e.g., fat content, caloric density). This is an example of:单项选择题

类似问题

Based on the study description as written, which of the following potential confounders did Dr. Buckian control for in this study? Select ALL that apply.

A project has a required return of 12.6 percent, an initial cash outflow of $42,100, and cash inflows of $16,500 in Year 1, $11,700 in Year 2, and $10,400 in Year 4. What is the net present value?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单