In order to make causal inference in an observational study with confounding by sex, the investigator must adjust for sex in the analysis phase. This is necessary to satisfy the assumption of:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To start, consider what each causal assumption means in observational research. 
Option a: Consistency. This assumption says that the observed outcome under the actually received exposure equals the potential outcome under that exposure. It is about aligning observed data with the potential outcomes framework, not about controlling for confounding by sex in analysis. 
Option b: Positivity (overlap). This requires that every combination of covariates has a positive probability of receiving each exposure level. While related to study validity, positivity does not specifically address the need to adjust for confounders like sex to enable fair comparisons between exposure groups. 
Option c: Exchangeability. This is the core idea that, conditional on measured covariates (such as sex), the distribution of potential outcomes would be the same between exposed and unexposed groups. Adjusting for sex in the analysis helps satisfy exchangeability by removing confounding bias that would otherwise make groups incomparable. 
Option d: Well-defined interventions. This pertains to specifying exactly what would be done in a hypothetical intervention to define the causal contrast. It is important for causal interpretation but does not directly describe why adjusting for sex is necessary to achieve exchangeability. 
Thus, among the listed options, adjusting for sex to address confounding and achieve comparable groups corresponds to the exchangeability assumption, since conditioning on sex aims to make the exposed and unexposed groups exchangeable with respect to the outcome.

In order to make causal inference in an observational study with confounding by sex, the investigator must adjust for sex in the analysis phase. This is necessary to satisfy the assumption of:Single choice

Similar Questions

Which of the following is a structural reason why diabetes and heart disease would be associated in the DAG above?

Which of the following assumptions are required for causal inference from observational studies?

It is possible to verify the exchangeability assumption in observational studies.

How do mechanisms help solve the reference class problem, according to Clarke et al.?

位置5的问题 When it is impossible/irresponsible to run a randomized experiment, there is always an approach using observational data that will guarantee a bias-free estimate of the true treatment effect.TrueFalseDon't Know清除选择

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler