According to the precautionary principle, who has the responsibility to prove whether harm is being caused?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Under the precautionary principle, those proposing or introducing a new technology, chemical, or activity must demonstrate it will not cause unacceptable harm — so the innovator bears the burden of proof.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Precautionary principle: when there is plausible risk of serious or irreversible harm and scientific uncertainty, preventive action should be taken rather than waiting for full proof of harm.
- Burden of proof shift: the principle shifts responsibility from the public to the proponent (innovator/producer) to show safety.
- Application: environmental policy, public health, chemical regulation (e.g., REACH), biotechnology.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- Identify the parties: the public (general population), the innovator (the developer or proponent of the activity/product), and lawyers (legal advocates).
- The precautionary principle addresses decision-making under uncertainty about harm. It is intended to prevent harm proactively.
- To be proactive, someone must provide evidence that the proposed activity is acceptably safe; the principle explicitly allocates that role to the proponent/innovator rather than expecting the public to prove harm after the fact.

3) Calculations
- Not applicable; reasoning is conceptual.

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- Requiring the innovator to prove safety is the core of the precautionary approach: it avoids exposing society to potential risks while waiting for conclusive scientific proof. This encourages risk assessment, testing, and safer design by those introducing innovations.

5) Why the other options are incorrect
- A. The public: expecting the public to prove harm would mean waiting until damage occurs and places an unfair and impractical burden on individuals or society.
- C. Lawyers: lawyers may litigate or argue cases, but the principle is not assigning legal professionals the evidentiary burden to establish harm or safety.

Conclusion: The innovator is responsible for proving whether harm is being caused, so the correct answer is B.

According to the precautionary principle, who has the responsibility to prove whether harm is being caused?单项选择题

类似问题

A defendant in a civil case need not present any evidence because the plaintiff bears: Blank ______.

The prosecution in a criminal case need only establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed the crime

In the movie example, who was responsible for proving whether harm was being caused?

A 62.9 kg lady is standing on a weighing scale in an elevator as shown in the diagram below. Assume gravitational acceleration = 15 ms-2 Given that the elevator is accelerating upwards at 3.7 ms-2 , determine the magnitude of the normal force on the lady.

An object is fired from ground level at an angle of 31.9 degrees to the horizontal. Taking acceleration due to gravity = 7.65 ms-2 If the initial speed is 5.6 ms-1, how far from the starting point will it hit the ground? Assume air resistance is negligible.

Which of the following equations of motion would be used to calculate the displacement given the initial and final velocities as well as the acceleration?

A 51.8 kg lady is standing on a weighing scale (calibrated to 9.81 ms-2) in an elevator as shown in the diagram below. The scale is then calibrated to 7.67 ms-2 Given that the elevator is accelerating downwards at 2.2 ms-2 , determine the reading on the scale.

An object is fired from ground level at an angle of 39 degrees to the horizontal. Taking acceleration due to gravity = 7.65 ms-2 If the initial speed is 6.8 ms-1, how far from the starting point will it hit the ground? Assume air resistance is negligible.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单