Select the most appropriate opinion for the scenario below.

You are auditing Kyoto Sake Pty Ltd. They are a small company brewing sake here in Australia. They have recently raised $5m capital through an invitation for new shareholders. Their current total assets is $2m.

The $5m was spent on $1m worth of additional brewing equipment, and the remainder was spent to help set up export networks for their product. This has included hiring staff in the USA and Singapore, as well as setting up offices and distribution warehouses.

You find that there is a problem with depreciation for all PPE - there was an incorrect number of years for useful life use. There are also some problems with the foreign currency transactions. Management have agreed to make the adjustments to financial statements for both of these issues.

As you get ready to sign the audit report - the client announces they've signed an agreement to be purchased by a major international alcohol company. They add this information to the note disclosures in the financial statements.

Question

Select the most appropriate opinion for the scenario below.

You are auditing Kyoto Sake Pty Ltd. They are a small company brewing sake here in Australia. They have recently raised $5m capital through an invitation for new shareholders. Their current total assets is $2m.

The $5m was spent on $1m worth of additional brewing equipment, and the remainder was spent to help set up export networks for their product. This has included hiring staff in the USA and Singapore, as well as setting up offices and distribution warehouses.

You find that there is a problem with depreciation for all PPE - there was an incorrect number of years for useful life use. There are also some problems with the foreign currency transactions. Management have agreed to make the adjustments to financial statements for both of these issues.

As you get ready to sign the audit report - the client announces they've signed an agreement to be purchased by a major international alcohol company. They add this information to the note disclosures in the financial statements.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, let's restate what the scenario presents and the answer choices to ensure we are analyzing the same content.
Question context: You are auditing Kyoto Sake Pty Ltd, an Australian small brewer that recently raised $5m capital. The funds were spent on PPE and setting up export networks (staffing in the USA and Singapore, offices, warehouses). There are known issues with depreciation (wrong useful lives for PPE) and foreign currency transactions, and management agrees to adjust the financial statements. After that, the client reveals they will be acquired by a major international company and notes this in the disclosures. Answer options: Adverse opinion; Unmodified opinion with emphasis of matter; Qualified opinion; Unmodified opinion.

Now, evaluate each option in turn, noting why it could be considered and why it is not correct given the facts.
Option 1: Adverse opinion
- This would be issued if the financial statements were materially misstated and the misstatements were not corrected, such that the overall financial statements are misleading. In this case, management has agreed to adjust the depreciation and foreign currency issues, which suggests those misstatements are being corrected.
- Furthermore, there is no indication of pervasive misstatement across the financial statements beyond the specified issues, so an adverse opinion would generally be too harsh.
- Therefore, the adverse opinion is not the appropriate type here.

Option 2: Unmodified opinion with emphasis of matter
- An unmodified (clean) opinion is appropriate when, apart from the matter emphasized, the financial statements are presented fairly in all material respects.
- The scenario notes two material issues (depreciation period for PPE and foreign currency transaction errors) that management will adjust. If those issues are properly corrected and disclosed, the financial statements can still be considered fairly presented.
- Additionally, the client has disclosed a significant subsequent event (the agreement to be purchased by a major international company). If this subsequent event is appropriately disclosed in the notes, the auditor can issue an unmodified opinion with an emphasis of matter to draw users’ attention to the disclosure.
- An emphasis of matter is specifically used to highlight a matter that is already adequately presented or disclosed in the financial statements but is of such importance that it requires the auditor’s explicit mention. Since the acquisition announcement is disclosed, and the corrections will be made, this option aligns with standards for highlighting the subsequent event while preserving the unmodified opinion.

Option 3: Qualified opinion
- A qualified opinion arises when there is a material misstatement or limitation in scope that is not pervasive but is sufficiently material to affect the financial statements as a whole, or when the auditor cannot obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
- The scenario indicates adjustments will be made and there is disclosure of the acquisition, which reduces the likelihood of a scope limitation or pervasive misstatements. Unless there is another unresolved issue not stated, a qualified opinion would not be warranted.

Option 4: Unmodified opinion
- An unmodified opinion is appropriate only if there are no material misstatements and no emphasis of matter requiring highlighting beyond disclosures. In this case, there is a material matter that the auditor would want to emphasize (the significant subsequent event) even though the statements are otherwise fairly presented.
- Without emphasizing the subsequent event, the note disclosure might be overlooked by users; hence, this option would neglect an important matter.

In summary, the core factors are: (a) the identified PPE depreciation and foreign currency issues are to be adjusted, addressing potential misstatements; (b) a significant subsequent event (the acquisition agreement) has been disclosed in notes and warrants emphasis; (c) these conditions align with issuing an Unmodified opinion with emphasis of matter rather than a pure Unmodified opinion, Adverse, or Qualified opinion.

Similar Questions

During the ICFR audit, the auditor identified two significant deficiencies and concluded that the combined potential financial statement effect did not rise to the level of a material weakness. What opinion will be issued for the ICFR audit?

Auditors issue an ________ to indicate whether financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accepted accounting rules.

An “unqualified” report is:

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

Name the political scientist who argues that parties are designed to serve the needs of ambitious politicians (namely candidates and officeholders).

Name the political scientist who said this famous quote about the problems of pluralism: “The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly choir sings with a strong upper-class accent.”

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler