Which of the following statements is correct concerning the use of negative confirmation requests?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When evaluating statements about negative confirmation requests, we need to consider what auditors expect from this procedure and what the absence of a response implies.
Option 1: 'Negative confirmation requests are effective when detection risk is low.' This is not accurate because negative confirmations are generally more useful when detection risk is higher and substantive testing is limited; they are less trustworthy when the population is large or when respondents are likely to ignore them. In low-detection-risk situations, other procedures might suffice, making this statement misleading.
Option 2: 'Negative confirmation requests are effective when understatements of account balances are suspected.' This is incorrect because negative confirmations primarily help detect overstatements, not understatements. If understatements are suspected, the risk assessment and procedures would address it differently, so the claim reverses the typical use.
Option 3: 'Unreturned negative confirmation requests indicate that alternative procedures are necessary.' This option overstates the implication of a nonresponse. While a lack of response may prompt additional procedures, auditors typically pursue alternative evidence but do not automatically conclude that they are always necessary; they evaluate in the context of risks, responses, and the overall evidence gathered. The statement is unfairly absolute.
Option 4: 'Unreturned negative confirmation requests rarely provide significant explicit evidence.' This aligns with auditing guidance: when a negative confirmation is not returned, it provides little to no direct evidence about the accuracy of balances or assertions, because nonresponse could be due to benign reasons (sender did not reply, incorrect address, etc.) and does not confirm anything about the amount. Therefore, nonresponse rarely constitutes significant explicit evidence and requires alternative procedures or additional corroboration to obtain sufficient audit evidence.

Which of the following statements is correct concerning the use of negative confirmation requests?单项选择题

类似问题

An auditor should normally perform alternative procedures to substantiate the existence of accounts receivable when:

Auditors ordinarily send a standard confirmation request to all banks with which the client has done business during the year under audit, regardless of the year-end balances. A purpose of this procedure is to:

Which of the following sets of information does an auditor usually confirm on one form?

In auditing accounts receivable the negative form of confirmation request most likely would be used when:

When evaluating a new project, firms should include in the projected cash flows all of the following EXCEPT:

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单