In a classic study by Hastorf and Cantril (1954), undergraduates from Dartmouth and Princeton were asked to watch a film of a particularly rough football game between their two university teams. Their perceptions of the game were then analysed. Fans from Princeton were most likely to make which of the following observations about the game?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question centers on Hastorf and Cantril's classic study of perceptual bias, where two groups (Dartmouth and Princeton fans) watched the same football game footage and tended to see the other side as more aggressive. Here is a detailed look at each option:

Option A: 'The Dartmouth players acted in self-defense against the hostile Princeton team.' This framing suggests that Dartmouth fans, not Princeton fans, would predominantly perceive the Dartmouth players as acting in self-defense. However, the study demonstrates that each group tends to interpret actions through the lens of their own team’s identity, often blaming the opponent rather than their own team. Since the question asks about Princeton fans’ observations, this option attributes a defensive posture to Dartmouth rather than Princeton, making it inconsistent with the specified perspective.

Option B: 'The Princeton players acted in self-defense against the hostile Dartmouth team.' This aligns with the core finding that observers tend to view actions through their in-group bias. Princeton fans are more likely to interpret the action as self-defense by Princeton players against a hostile Dartmouth team, framing the Princeton players as reacting to provocation rather than initiating aggression. The self-defense interpretation helps explain why Princeton viewers might downplay Princeton aggression and emphasize defensive motives.

Option C: 'The Dartmouth players showed good sportsmanship.' While some viewers might perceive good sportsmanship, the original study emphasized divergent perceptions of aggression and hostility between groups. Saying Dartmouth players showed good sportsmanship would reflect a more favorable interpretation of the Dartmouth side, which is less consistent with the common bias pattern reported when Princeton fans view the game.

Option D: 'The Princeton players showed poor sportsmanship.' This would attribute negative behavior to the Princeton players, which contrasts with the typical in-group favoritism bias observed in such studies. Princeton fans, identifying with their own team, are less likely to frame Princeton players as behaving poorly and more likely to view them as justified or defensive, rather than unduly aggressive.

In summary, the reasoning of observers in this study tends to reflect in-group bias, where Princeton fans would interpret actions in a way that favors Princeton and characterizes its players as defending against provocation. The other options either shift the interpretive focus away from the Princeton perspective or assign negative traits to the in-group, which is less consistent with the established findings of the researchers.

类似问题

An X Party voter acknowledges that crime has risen during an X Party administration but argues it’s due to local policies. This is an example of:

What is the key claim of the ‘Fundamental Attribution Error’?

What is one factor that makes it difficult for individuals to connect government policy with personal economic conditions?

The actor/observer bias is the tendency to see other people's behavior as while making attributions about our own behavior.

One of the reasons that people might not report discrimination when they experience is because:

The statements “I lost the race because I was tired” and “She lost the race because she has no athletic ability” are examples of

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单