The following questions refer to Chapter 2 (pp. 51-107).

Argument can best be defined as

Question

The following questions refer to Chapter 2 (pp. 51-107).

Argument can best be defined as

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Argument, in the context of critical thinking and rhetoric, is best understood as a reasoned exchange aimed at arriving at or testing conclusions. Key concepts include claims (statements being defended), reasons (logical premises that support claims), evidence (facts or data that back reasons), and the goal of inquiry or mutual understanding rather than mere victory or interruption.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Argument = claim + reasons + evidence, structured logically.
- Purpose can be persuasion or collaborative investigation (dialectic), seeking to clarify, justify, or revise beliefs.
- Effective argumentation requires listening, responding to objections, and using rational support—not interruption or mere assertion.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Compare each option to the academic definition of argument.
- Option B: "a logical investigation and discussion searching for mutual understanding" matches the emphasis on logic (reasons/evidence), investigation (testing claims), and discussion (exchange aiming for shared understanding).
- Other options either describe behavior (interrupting), bad practice (making claims without support), or a narrowly sociological study (thorough exploration of social discourse in a close-knit community) that misses the logical structure.

3. Calculations
- Not applicable; no numerical computation required.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- Option B captures both the method (logical investigation—use of reasons/evidence) and the aim (discussion searching for mutual understanding), aligning with standard textbook definitions of argument as reasoned discourse. It emphasizes exchange and rationale rather than conflict or unsupported assertion.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- Option A ("interrupting other speakers...") describes rude behavior, not argumentation.
- Option C ("people making claims without reasoning or support") describes assertions or propaganda, lacking the logical structure fundamental to arguments.
- Option D ("a thorough exploration of social discourse in a close-knit community") describes a sociological study, not the act of arguing or the logical structure of argumentation.

6. Conclusion
Therefore, the correct choice is "a logical investigation and discussion searching for mutual understanding," which matches the provided answer.

The following questions refer to Chapter 2 (pp. 51-107). Argument can best be defined as单项选择题

类似问题

You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,021.61. The bond matures in 11 years. What is the yield to maturity?

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

It will cost $9,600 to acquire an ice cream cart that is expected to produce cash inflows of $3,600 a year for three years. After the three years, the cart is expected to be worthless. What is the payback period?

A 3.25 percent Treasury bond is quoted at a price of 99.04. The bond pays interest semiannually. What is the current yield?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单