Nare’s professor has informed students that generative AI tools are not to be used for the graded activities and assignments in their class. However, Nare still has UPEI access to a premium generative AI tool that they used in another class last semester. Nare learned how to use it to do high-quality work on similar assignments. What should Nare do about the assignments in this course?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

An instructor’s explicit course rule about tool use must be followed: when a professor states generative AI is prohibited for graded work, that prohibition governs student behavior for that course.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Academic integrity and course policies: instructors set requirements and restrictions for assignments; violating them can be academic misconduct.  
- Institutional access vs. permission: having access to a University-provided tool does not override a course-level prohibition.  
- Acceptable use and disclosure: when AI use is allowed, students must usually follow citation or disclosure rules; when disallowed, disclosure/citation does not make use permissible.

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- Step 1: The professor has clearly communicated that generative AI tools are not to be used for graded activities in this class. That is a course rule.  
- Step 2: Nare still has access to a premium tool from UPEI, and prior experience with it, but access alone does not grant permission to contravene course rules.  
- Step 3: Using the tool despite the prohibition would breach the instructor’s policy and could be treated as academic misconduct, risking penalties (zero on assignment, disciplinary action).  
- Step 4: The correct action is to comply with the instructor’s prohibition, or if Nare believes an exception is warranted, ask the instructor for explicit, written permission before using the tool.

3) Why the correct answer is correct
Answer b is correct because it directly follows the instructor’s stated prohibition; respecting course-specific rules preserves academic integrity and avoids sanctions.

4) Why the other options are incorrect
- a) Access by UPEI and familiarity with the tool do not supersede an instructor’s prohibition.  
- c) “Judicious use and citation” would be appropriate only if the course or program allows AI; citation does not make use permissible when explicitly banned.  
- d) Claiming future-readiness does not justify breaking current course rules; being upfront does not remove the prohibition—permission must still be granted by the instructor.

Conclusion: Nare should not use generative AI for this course since the instructor has prohibited it; this matches the provided correct answer (b).

Similar Questions

Below are several examples of how some students use GenAI in their studies. Review each example and identify which of these practices you believe could be ineffective or even harmful for their learning.

12. What is the best title for this mini-lecture?

Educators worldwide embraced the use of ChatGPT by students to write essays and term papers.

Check all that apply: In this class, I’m allowed to use AI to…

The implementation and loading phase of the Database Life Cycle (DBLC) involves _____.

Which of the following parameters is used to determine the concentration of protein in a spectrophotometer?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler