Without his mates, Hari would be alone at uni. Now his mates have asked him to share his work so they can copy it. Hari has agreed to discuss with his friends how to do the work but he won’t hand over his assignment. Is this sound academic practice?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Collaborating on concepts and explaining methods while refusing to hand over your finished assignment preserves academic integrity — so the correct answer is Yes.

Relevant knowledge points:
- Academic integrity distinguishes acceptable collaboration (discussing concepts, clarifying methods, giving feedback) from misconduct (plagiarism and collusion: submitting another’s work as your own or producing identical submissions).
- Many university policies explicitly allow study-group discussion but forbid sharing the final copy or allowing others to copy your work.
- Good practice includes acknowledging any help received and following course-specific rules on collaboration.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Identify the permissible activity: The mates ask Hari to “share his work so they can copy it.” Copying a peer’s assignment and submitting it is collusion/plagiarism, which is prohibited.
2. Identify the permissible alternative: Hari agrees to “discuss with his friends how to do the work.” Discussing approaches, explaining reasoning, and helping peers understand concepts are normally allowed and encouraged.
3. Compare actions to policy: Handing over the finished assignment would enable direct copying and would violate academic standards. Discussing methods and guiding peers does not produce identical submissions, so it does not constitute cheating when done within policy boundaries.
4. Consider limits: Discussions should not result in identical answers; students should produce and submit their own work and acknowledge any substantial assistance where required.

Why the correct answer is correct:
Because Hari refuses to transfer his completed assignment (preventing direct copying) while offering legitimate help through discussion, he is maintaining the boundary between collaborative learning and academic misconduct.

Why other choices would be incorrect:
- “No” would be incorrect because it would treat all peer assistance as misconduct, ignoring permissible discussion.
- “Only sometimes” is misleading without context; the key is the nature of the help — discussion is acceptable, handing over is not.

Conclusion: This behavior is sound academic practice. The final answer is Yes.

Without his mates, Hari would be alone at uni. Now his mates have asked him to share his work so they can copy it. Hari has agreed to discuss with his friends how to do the work but he won’t hand over his assignment. Is this sound academic practice?单项选择题

类似问题

Type your answer. Name one of the five values that underpin academic integrity.

What is academic integrity?

Question at position 11 Which scenario best represents an ethical dilemma?Plagiarising because of deadline pressureChoosing between two project deadlinesCollaborating on group workUsing Microsoft Word instead of Google DocsClear my selection

Fill in the blank ____________________________Includes the intentional use of unauthorized materials, information, notes, study aids or other devices or materials in any academic exercise, or attempts thereof

True or False. You are responsible for the work submitted on a group assignment if your name is on the paper, even if you yourself didn’t commit an honor code violation?

Fill in the blank ____________________________Includes the statement of any untruth, either verbally or in writing, with respect to any element of one's academic work, or attempts thereof.

True or false. The Office of Undergraduate Academic Integrity offers a free tool for students to use called Turnitin?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单