In his talk, Prof Rob Adams said:

The infrastructure we needed for that, if you take the 65,000 dwellings... Take 10,000 out for Docklands where they had to do a lot of roadwork and stuff like that. Take 12,000 out for Southbank where there was some roadwork. The remainder, not one piece of infrastructure was put in.

Why was it possible to accommodate 43,000 new residential dwellings in Melbourne's CBD without constructing new infrastructure?

Select a single answer.

Question

In his talk, Prof Rob Adams said:

The infrastructure we needed for that, if you take the 65,000 dwellings... Take 10,000 out for Docklands where they had to do a lot of roadwork and stuff like that. Take 12,000 out for Southbank where there was some roadwork. The remainder, not one piece of infrastructure was put in.

Why was it possible to accommodate 43,000 new residential dwellings in Melbourne's CBD without constructing new infrastructure?

Select a single answer.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

High urban density combined with mixed-use development allows existing infrastructure to carry much greater person-throughput without construction of new trunk services.

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Infrastructure capacity is determined by peak loads (water, sewer, transport, electricity) and utilization patterns.  
- Mixed-use and higher residential density spread demand temporally (night/day) and spatially, smoothing peaks that were previously single-use (office-only CBDs).  
- Adaptive reuse of buildings and short-trip patterns in dense areas reduce new demand on roads and networks and increase efficiency of existing systems (economies of scale).

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- Prof Rob Adams gave totals: 65,000 dwellings planned, with 10,000 in Docklands and 12,000 in Southbank requiring roadworks. Subtract those two subsets to get the remainder that needed no new infrastructure: 65,000 – 10,000 – 12,000 = 43,000.  
- Those 43,000 dwellings were accommodated within the existing built environment of the CBD (offices converted or infill housing). Because the CBD had previously been dominated by offices, much infrastructure capacity (water, sewer, electricity, public transport) was sized for large daytime populations but under‑utilized at night.  
- Introducing residents used that unused capacity during evenings and weekends, and mixed-use reduced travel demand and the need for extra road capacity. Hence no new major infrastructure installations were required.

3) Calculations (intermediate steps)
- Total dwellings: 65,000  
- Docklands requiring works: 10,000  
- Southbank requiring works: 12,000  
- Remainder = 65,000 – 10,000 – 12,000 = 43,000

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- The stated explanation (density + mixed-use led to more efficient use of existing infrastructure) directly accounts for how peak and off-peak demands were balanced, allowing existing networks to absorb additional residential load without new construction.

5) Why other options are incorrect
- “Deliberately over‑engineered in the 1980s” is speculative and unlikely the primary reason; infrastructure sizing typically reflects past needs, not specific future housing targets.  
- “State government funded upgrades beforehand” contradicts Adams’s point that no new infrastructure was put in for the remainder.  
- “Residents consumed significantly less per capita” may be partly true but is insufficient to explain accommodation of tens of thousands without new infrastructure; the central mechanism is utilization and temporal smoothing.  
- “None of the above” is incorrect because the first option matches the observed mechanism.

6) Conclusion
The most accurate explanation is that the combination of density and mixed-use development allowed existing infrastructure to be used far more efficiently than when the CBD was office-only, which confirms the provided correct answer.

Similar Questions

28. Investing in Answer Question 22[input] can create a less concentrated distribution of population and commerce.

Prof Rob Adams spoke about the importance of a high-quality public realm to attract people to a city. Which of the following is a correct statement about an action that was taken to improve the quality of Melbourne’s public realm? Select a single answer.

Section FQuestions 25 – 28. Complete the following sentences with ONE WORD OR A NUMBER from the lecture. 25. American ____ have built more car spaces than is legally required.

24. America’s enthusiasm for parking has

23. Whole areas with city buildings were demolished because

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler