Jenny had been in a happy relationship with Robinson for about three years. Jenny had nothing to complain about because Robinson treated her really well. However, Jenny dumped Robinson a week ago and started to date another wealthy and good-looking guy. From the perspective of Social Penetration Theory, which of the following would explain Jenny’s decision?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Starting with the question, Jenny’s decision to move on from a happy three-year relationship to date someone wealthier and more attractive can be analyzed through Social Penetration Theory in terms of the key evaluative standards: CL (comparison level) and CLalt (comparison level for alternatives).
Option A: CL_alt > CL > Outcome
This ordering suggests that the perceived quality of the best available alternative relationship (CL_alt) is higher than Jenny’s current level of satisfaction or payoff from the relationship (Outcome), and that the current level (CL) sits somewhere in between. In Social Penetration Theory terms, if CLalt exceeds the outcome, the individual weighs leaving as a viable option because available alternatives look better than what the current relationship provides. The fact that CL is higher than the outcome also reinforces that the current relationship is not meeting her standards or expectations, further supporting a move toward the more attractive alternative.
Option B: CL > CL_alt > Outcome
Here, CL (the standard of comparison within the current relational context) is higher than CLalt, implying that the current relationship is at least as good as, or better than, the best available alternative. If CL > CLalt, Jenny would typically have little incentive to leave because even the best alternative does not surpass her current situational benchmark. This would not align with the observed decision to date someone wealthier and leave the prior relationship.
Option C: CL > Outcome > CL_alt
In this sequence, the outcome (the current relationship payoff) exceeds CL_alt, and CL also exceeds Outcome. If the current payoff is higher than the alt and exceeds CLalt, the theory would generally predict stability or at least a lower likelihood of leaving, since alternatives are not evaluated as superior to the current situation. This contradicts the premise that Jenny left for a wealthier and more attractive partner.
Option D: CL_alt > Outcome > CL
This ordering states that CLalt is higher than the outcome, and the outcome is higher than CL. While CLalt > Outcome can justify considering leaving, having Outcome > CL suggests that the current relationship’s payoff exceeds the internal standard (CL), which would typically discourage breaking up unless there is a strong perceived improvement via the alternative. The mixed signal here is less directly aligned with a clear decision to end the relationship compared to Option A, where the alternative clearly dominates both the current payoff and the current level.
In sum, Option A presents the clearest pattern consistent with Social Penetration Theory for choosing to leave an existing relationship in favor of a better alternative: the best alternative (CL_alt) outstrips the current outcome, and the current level (CL) sits above or between the two, reinforcing the pull toward the higher-value alternative while the current payoff is not satisfactory enough to dissuade it.

Similar Questions

Which of the following statements regarding social penetration is INACCURATE?

According to lecture on Social Penetration Theory, the location of biographic information (e.g., age) on one’s personality structure may vary across individuals.

According to Social Penetration Theory, the threshold above which an outcome seems attractive is called the

Question at position 18 Establishing a wholly-owned subsidiary provides the quickest access to a new market.TrueFalse

Question at position 17 Leading companies should recognize that a firm based in a country with a national competitive advantage is not guaranteed ............................ as it implements its chosen international business-level strategy.dominanceplansuccessNone of the Above

Question at position 16 Costs associated with the issues firms face when entering foreign markets, including unfamiliar operating environments, economic, administrative, and cultural differences, are known as regionalization costs.TrueFalse

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler