Choose A, B, C or D as the best answer.2. Which statement would the author, most probably, agree with?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Because the author links noise to measurable harms (hearing loss, sleep disruption, stress and cardiovascular risk), the logical stance is that noise pollution must be treated as a public health issue.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Public health: concerns health risks that affect populations and require policy, prevention, and collective action.
- Noise pollution effects: includes immediate (hearing damage) and long-term effects (sleep disturbance, increased stress hormones, raised blood pressure, higher risk of heart disease).
- Distinction between describing a symptom (chronic condition) and advocating for public-health-level responses.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
Step 1: Identify the author’s emphasis — the passage emphasizes health consequences of environmental noise (both physiological and population-level effects).  
Step 2: Map author emphasis to the choices — which option reflects concern about population health and the need for systemic response?  
Step 3: Determine best match — “Addressing noise pollution is a public health issue” directly captures the author’s focus on health impacts and collective responsibility.

3. Calculations/intermediate steps
- No numerical calculations are required for this inference question; reasoning is qualitative and evidence-based.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- Treating noise as a public health issue follows naturally if the author links noise to widespread, preventable health harms. That framing implies policy, regulation, and prevention—core elements of public health—so option D directly matches the author’s probable stance.

5. Why the other options are incorrect
- A (“nearly every city a dangerous place”) overstates and generalizes beyond the author’s measured concern.  
- B (“issues too obvious to worry about”) contradicts the passage’s seriousness about health effects.  
- C (“can become a chronic condition”) is partially true (long-term exposure can cause ongoing harm) but is narrower: it describes an outcome rather than the policy/health framing the author uses.

6. Conclusion
Given the passage’s focus on health consequences and the need for systemic response, the correct choice is D: “Addressing noise pollution is a public health issue.” This matches the provided answer.

Choose A, B, C or D as the best answer.2. Which statement would the author, most probably, agree with?Single choice

Similar Questions

11. Which of the following statements best summarises the main idea of this paragraph?

Choose A, B or C as the best answer.3. The speaker seems most concerned about:

Question 29 and 30. Choose A, B or C as the best answer. 29. Which statement is the speaker most likely to agree with?

3. The speaker seems most disappointed about:

Question 29 and 30. Choose A, B or C as the best answer. 29. Which statement is the speaker most likely to agree with?

Choose A, B or C as the best answer.3. The speaker seems most concerned about:

Choose A, B, C or D as the best answer.2. Which statement would the author, most probably, agree with?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler